Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="The Range" data-source="post: 3699523" data-attributes="member: 51803">If the union wanted informed involvement it would engage all new members with a crisp contract and an overview of basic rights and expectations. That's the foundation. Instead, we have members pointing out the obvious while not understanding the implications: 18-year-olds, participating in a first job geared towards poor people (lower iq), can't carry a vote. Therefore, it is all part-timers at direct fault for making significantly less money and enjoying fewer rights when compared to their counterparts. Part-timers should have their own contract if the union nefariously chooses not to engage new members. Those of us who have zero interest in full-time will regain our voice that is drowned out by full-timers with (typically) conflicting interests.</blockquote>