Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Immigration
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="oldngray" data-source="post: 1368850" data-attributes="member: 45230"><p><a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/383291/what-if-they-were-refugees-mark-krikorian" target="_blank">What If They <em>Were</em> Refugees?</a></p><p></p><p>They still should be turned away.</p><p></p><p>Why? Because they traveled more than 1,000 miles through a country where they should have claimed asylum, if they were genuinely seeking it.</p><p></p><p>The <a href="http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/StatusOfRefugees.aspx" target="_blank">1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees</a> includes this provision</p><p>Article 31 – Refugees unlawfully in the country of refuge</p><p></p><p>1. The Contracting States shall not impose penalties, on account of their illegal entry or presence, on refugees who, <strong>coming directly from a territory where their life or freedom was threatened in the sense of article 1</strong>, enter or are present in their territory without authorization, provided they present themselves without delay to the authorities and show good cause for their illegal entry or presence.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/383291/what-if-they-were-refugees-mark-krikorian" target="_blank">http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/383291/what-if-they-were-refugees-mark-krikorian</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="oldngray, post: 1368850, member: 45230"] [URL='http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/383291/what-if-they-were-refugees-mark-krikorian']What If They [I]Were[/I] Refugees?[/URL] They still should be turned away. Why? Because they traveled more than 1,000 miles through a country where they should have claimed asylum, if they were genuinely seeking it. The [URL='http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/StatusOfRefugees.aspx']1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees[/URL] includes this provision Article 31 – Refugees unlawfully in the country of refuge 1. The Contracting States shall not impose penalties, on account of their illegal entry or presence, on refugees who, [B]coming directly from a territory where their life or freedom was threatened in the sense of article 1[/B], enter or are present in their territory without authorization, provided they present themselves without delay to the authorities and show good cause for their illegal entry or presence. [url]http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/383291/what-if-they-were-refugees-mark-krikorian[/url] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Immigration
Top