Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Immigration
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Other Side" data-source="post: 984410" data-attributes="member: 17969"><p>Too bad life isnt a movie ISLAND. With a movie, you can turn it off and the problem goes away. Here, you want to have BOTH sides of an argument and end up argueing with yourself.</p><p></p><p>On one hand, you ARGUE that the goverment shouldnt require religious groups from providing coverage for birth control. You say that its the churches right to enforce this, and in the process, encourage teen births, and out of wedlock births to adults that end up on welfare (something you hate)</p><p></p><p>ON the other hand, you ARGUE that too much money is being spent on welfare for single moms both teen and adult, and you claim its driving us into the poorhouse.</p><p></p><p>Well, which is it???</p><p></p><p>Do you want to support the restraint of birth control and allow free love and GOD to make a decision to make a baby that ends up on welfare or do you want to cut welfare?</p><p></p><p>You cant have it both ways. </p><p></p><p>The church should have no say on what happens to society at large with beliefs from 2000 years ago that end up costing us millions of dollars in tax money for welfare to pay for births they dont want to prevent.</p><p></p><p>The church's position is one that is self serving, and NOT one that serves GOD. There is nothing in the bible that proves that GOD was against birth control. There is some silly story about ER and ONAN where GOD ends up killing both men, but that story is SOOOO STUPID it hardly proves GOD was against birth control.</p><p></p><p>The Church's only purpose to increase its following by having wreckless births. In my opinion, sort of like Amway. Bringing people in behind you.</p><p></p><p>The reality is, the church uses the story of ER and ONAN as some sort of interpretation that birth control is against GODS will, but this aint 2000 years ago when the world wasnt overcrowded and underfed.</p><p></p><p>You have to pick a side ISLAND, either you want uncontrolled births that ultimately drive YOU into the minority race, or YOU jump on the contraception method and limit the amount of births to races you dont particularly like.</p><p></p><p>Someday, you will indeed by a minority, just as MORELUCK is in CALIFORNIA. </p><p></p><p>Hispanics are now the majority of the state, and someday , I could only hope as a minority, a white kid will be cutting my lawn.</p><p></p><p>Peace</p><p></p><p>TOS</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Other Side, post: 984410, member: 17969"] Too bad life isnt a movie ISLAND. With a movie, you can turn it off and the problem goes away. Here, you want to have BOTH sides of an argument and end up argueing with yourself. On one hand, you ARGUE that the goverment shouldnt require religious groups from providing coverage for birth control. You say that its the churches right to enforce this, and in the process, encourage teen births, and out of wedlock births to adults that end up on welfare (something you hate) ON the other hand, you ARGUE that too much money is being spent on welfare for single moms both teen and adult, and you claim its driving us into the poorhouse. Well, which is it??? Do you want to support the restraint of birth control and allow free love and GOD to make a decision to make a baby that ends up on welfare or do you want to cut welfare? You cant have it both ways. The church should have no say on what happens to society at large with beliefs from 2000 years ago that end up costing us millions of dollars in tax money for welfare to pay for births they dont want to prevent. The church's position is one that is self serving, and NOT one that serves GOD. There is nothing in the bible that proves that GOD was against birth control. There is some silly story about ER and ONAN where GOD ends up killing both men, but that story is SOOOO STUPID it hardly proves GOD was against birth control. The Church's only purpose to increase its following by having wreckless births. In my opinion, sort of like Amway. Bringing people in behind you. The reality is, the church uses the story of ER and ONAN as some sort of interpretation that birth control is against GODS will, but this aint 2000 years ago when the world wasnt overcrowded and underfed. You have to pick a side ISLAND, either you want uncontrolled births that ultimately drive YOU into the minority race, or YOU jump on the contraception method and limit the amount of births to races you dont particularly like. Someday, you will indeed by a minority, just as MORELUCK is in CALIFORNIA. Hispanics are now the majority of the state, and someday , I could only hope as a minority, a white kid will be cutting my lawn. Peace TOS [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Immigration
Top
