Israel

[Thebrownblob]

Greenwald said under the npt they can enrich to watever they like

Countries that wouldve enriched to 90% wouldve been all the ones that have nukes i assume

Btw i do believe usa and israel have many religious fanatics

Mearsheimer says the country most likely to use a nuke is israel

I believe Iran can enrich to whatever they want. They just are going to face consequences.

Are you really comparing religious fanaticism and the United States and Israel to Iran who is literally a theocracy?

 

[rickyb]

If Israel is most likely why have they never used a nuke?

Do you understand logic lol

 

[oldngray]

Do you understand logic lol

Do you?

Apparently not.

 

[Thebrownblob]

Do you understand logic lol

Do you? Your argument falls apart when you claim Iran needs them to protect themselves. They just did protect themselves from someone who actually has a nuclear weapon actually two countries that have a nuclear weapon. And Iran didn’t need one.

 

[rickyb]

I believe Iran can enrich to whatever they want. They just are going to face consequences.

Are you really comparing religious fanaticism and the United States and Israel to Iran who is literally a theocracy?

Greenwald and mearsheimer have brought up the myths weve been told about iran vs how theyve actually acted

I agree its a theocracy

We need to follow intl law and not be hypocrites about nukes

 

[vantexan]

Greenwald said under the npt they can enrich to watever they like

Countries that wouldve enriched to 90% wouldve been all the ones that have nukes i assume

Btw i do believe usa and israel have many religious fanatics

Mearsheimer says the country most likely to use a nuke is israel

Yah, those crazy Christians and Jews in the streets screaming in unison "Death to Iran!"

You can't name one country enriching to 60% or more for the sole purpose of nuclear power. Why would they, it would be stupid? But a stupid argument has never deterred you.

 

[rickyb]

Do you? Your argument falls apart when you claim Iran needs them to protect themselves. They just did protect themselves from someone who actually has a nuclear weapon actually two countries that have a nuclear weapon. And Iran didn’t need one.

Many ppl on here have correctly said nukes are a deterrent

For example the indian pakistan war ended quickly

 

[Thebrownblob]

Greenwald and mearsheimer have brought up the myths weve been told about iran vs how theyve actually acted

I agree its a theocracy

We need to follow intl law and not be hypocrites about nukes

I wonder how many myths the Iranian government spreads?

There is no meaningful international law because there’s no enforcers.

 

[oldngray]

Greenwald and mearsheimer have brought up the myths weve been told about iran vs how theyve actually acted

I agree its a theocracy

We need to follow intl law and not be hypocrites about nukes

International law says that countries that don't have nukes aren't allowed to get them.

 

[UnionStrong]

Apparently not according to greenwald and wilkerson

 

[rickyb]

Yah, those crazy Christians and Jews in the streets screaming in unison "Death to Iran!"

You can't name one country enriching to 60% or.more for the sole purpose of nuclear power. Why would they, it would be stupid? But a stupid argument has never deterred you.

Im sure the us ambassador to israel is 1 of them. He referenced nukes in a tweet trump retweeted. Trump is allied with christian fascists

 

[UnionStrong]

Greenwald said under the npt they can enrich to watever they like

Countries that wouldve enriched to 90% wouldve been all the ones that have nukes i assume

Btw i do believe usa and israel have many religious fanatics

Mearsheimer says the country most likely to use a nuke is israel

Clownworld

 

[Thebrownblob]

Many ppl on here have correctly said nukes are a deterrent

For example the indian pakistan war ended quickly

Well, apparently, many people have been wrong because I don’t think Iran had one iota of issues, launching ballistic and hypersonic missiles at a nuclear power. Your argument is both hypocritical because of your previous stance and illogical as the evidence has shown. Iran didn’t have any trouble protecting itself.

 

[rickyb]

I wonder how many myths the Iranian government spreads?

There is no meaningful international law because there’s no enforcers.

International law works over 90% of the time but its not perfect

Govts lie

 

[rickyb]

Well, apparently, many people have been wrong because I don’t think I ran at one iota of issues, launching ballistic and hypersonic missiles at a nuclear power. Your argument is both hypocritical because of your previous stance and illogical as the evidence has shown. Iran didn’t have any trouble protecting itself.

Another example would be how trump dealt with north korea

 

[oldngray]

Many ppl on here have correctly said nukes are a deterrent

For example the indian pakistan war ended quickly

India and Pakistan weren't allowed to get nukes under NPT. What did international law do to them?

 

[UnionStrong]

I wonder how many myths the Iranian government spreads?

There is no meaningful international law because there’s no enforcers.

The ayatollah just came on state television and said Iran had defeated Israel and the US.

 

[Thebrownblob]

International law works over 90% of the time but its not perfect

Govts lie

It never works and governments lie with no consequence, nothing you can do about it.

International law is about as important as student government was in school. It’s just for showing to make people feel good.

 

[Thebrownblob]

India and Pakistan weren't allowed to get nukes under NPT. What did international law do to them?

Nothing

 

[rickyb]

Yah, those crazy Christians and Jews in the streets screaming in unison "Death to Iran!"

You can't name one country enriching to 60% or.more for the sole purpose of nuclear power. Why would they, it would be stupid? But a stupid argument has never deterred you.

All the countries that have nukes mustve been over 90%