Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="newfie" data-source="post: 5344796" data-attributes="member: 58700">that was silly. The folks who entered the capital and did nothing else but protest were arrested , denied their constitutionally mandated rights and held in jail endlessly.&nbsp; most are accused of insurrection but have not been charged with such.&nbsp; Those who did nothing other than tresspassing should have been charged accordingly and released immediately.&nbsp; the police allowing them entry should completely negate charges of tresspassing unless they forced entry some other way.Others who engaged in destruction should have been charged accordingly and released as the law allows. Instead many were held as political prisoners and denied their rights.the protestors outside the judges houses are by the dems definition also insurrectionists trying to intimidate and disrupt a decision.&nbsp; they should have been either charged as the law allows and released or kept at a safe distance away.&nbsp; I think the charge of insurrection thrown out for any of this is silly but once you throw it out there for one act where the government was disrupted then you have to equally apply it to all acts that disrupt our government. the examples above are clear examples of politically motivated examples of how our laws are being enforced, not enforced and misinterpreted.its not about as your hysterical response states putting someone up against a wall but holding that the laws are applied fairly.your sides riots in the streets were supposedly about demanding equal treatment under the law yet here we see clear examples that the same side that ran those protest for equal treatement have no problem denying equal treatment to those on the opposite side of the political fence.at some point we all have to be outraged at all abuses of the law and not do so selectively depending on our political will.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="newfie, post: 5344796, member: 58700"] that was silly. The folks who entered the capital and did nothing else but protest were arrested , denied their constitutionally mandated rights and held in jail endlessly. most are accused of insurrection but have not been charged with such. Those who did nothing other than tresspassing should have been charged accordingly and released immediately. the police allowing them entry should completely negate charges of tresspassing unless they forced entry some other way. Others who engaged in destruction should have been charged accordingly and released as the law allows. Instead many were held as political prisoners and denied their rights. the protestors outside the judges houses are by the dems definition also insurrectionists trying to intimidate and disrupt a decision. they should have been either charged as the law allows and released or kept at a safe distance away. I think the charge of insurrection thrown out for any of this is silly but once you throw it out there for one act where the government was disrupted then you have to equally apply it to all acts that disrupt our government. the examples above are clear examples of politically motivated examples of how our laws are being enforced, not enforced and misinterpreted. its not about as your hysterical response states putting someone up against a wall but holding that the laws are applied fairly. your sides riots in the streets were supposedly about demanding equal treatment under the law yet here we see clear examples that the same side that ran those protest for equal treatement have no problem denying equal treatment to those on the opposite side of the political fence. at some point we all have to be outraged at all abuses of the law and not do so selectively depending on our political will. [/QUOTE]

Verification