Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Jim Crow: The Sequel
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="zubenelgenubi" data-source="post: 4822508" data-attributes="member: 63706"><p>See, that's why definitions matter? Guys you listen to slap the socialism label on just anything to confuse people. I don't believe I've ever stated that I'm against co-ops. If they can be successful enough to replace companies that have corporate structures, I don't see a problem with that. But to call them socialism is a misuse of the word. They could be communistic, if everyone shared everything and no one owned any personal property, but I doubt that's what's happening.</p><p></p><p>I've spent a lot of time thinking about company structure, as I am planning on starting my own business, and I understand the problems with corporate structure. I am trying to come up with a way to compensate employees more in line with the value that they create, rather than simply paying the market rate for labor. Problem is that sharing the wealth also means sharing the failure. If the company doesn't make money, no one gets paid.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="zubenelgenubi, post: 4822508, member: 63706"] See, that's why definitions matter? Guys you listen to slap the socialism label on just anything to confuse people. I don't believe I've ever stated that I'm against co-ops. If they can be successful enough to replace companies that have corporate structures, I don't see a problem with that. But to call them socialism is a misuse of the word. They could be communistic, if everyone shared everything and no one owned any personal property, but I doubt that's what's happening. I've spent a lot of time thinking about company structure, as I am planning on starting my own business, and I understand the problems with corporate structure. I am trying to come up with a way to compensate employees more in line with the value that they create, rather than simply paying the market rate for labor. Problem is that sharing the wealth also means sharing the failure. If the company doesn't make money, no one gets paid. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Jim Crow: The Sequel
Top