Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="govtmule" data-source="post: 1289616" data-attributes="member: 45888">Thanks to those that had positive and encouraging words of support.&nbsp; We hope our labor issues are resolved soon with just solutions.&nbsp; We need more people to visit facebook...worldport teamsters.&nbsp; Get involved with our discussions and issues. &nbsp;&nbsp; I have also noticed that there are more than likely paid company administrators that counter unionized arguments with pro company points of view.&nbsp; It seems that their main objective is to use negative hypotheticals to create dissonance.&nbsp; They believe dissonance will chip away at solidarity by putting doubt and confession in peoples minds.&nbsp; These individuals have no data or information that could support their points.&nbsp; Why?&nbsp; There is no way that they could be in a position to have access to that information.&nbsp; Even if they were in the position, it is very unlikely they have the skill set to formulate conclusions that would even support their arguments on this site.&nbsp; If they did have the data, information, and highly needed skill set to counter those pro-union points of view, they would not be on this site posting. For those that post negative hypotheticals, if you don&#039;t know what I am talking about, you just made my point.&nbsp; This leads me to conclude that some are low paid administrators hired to advance the company&#039;s position.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="govtmule, post: 1289616, member: 45888"] Thanks to those that had positive and encouraging words of support. We hope our labor issues are resolved soon with just solutions. We need more people to visit facebook...worldport teamsters. Get involved with our discussions and issues. I have also noticed that there are more than likely paid company administrators that counter unionized arguments with pro company points of view. It seems that their main objective is to use negative hypotheticals to create dissonance. They believe dissonance will chip away at solidarity by putting doubt and confession in peoples minds. These individuals have no data or information that could support their points. Why? There is no way that they could be in a position to have access to that information. Even if they were in the position, it is very unlikely they have the skill set to formulate conclusions that would even support their arguments on this site. If they did have the data, information, and highly needed skill set to counter those pro-union points of view, they would not be on this site posting. For those that post negative hypotheticals, if you don't know what I am talking about, you just made my point. This leads me to conclude that some are low paid administrators hired to advance the company's position. [/QUOTE]

Verification