Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="tiegirl" data-source="post: 518165" data-attributes="member: 11669">I do not work in a center however I think the current demands required by our top managment and I guess it comes from the very top down.&nbsp; As in, from our CEO, Scott Davis, who is a re hire.&nbsp; By the way did you get the update for our policy book that UPS will now rehire on a case by case basis.&nbsp; I guess that also come from the top down since the top is a rehire.&nbsp;From researching our CEO bio it is said he is a numbers guy.&nbsp; How can you not be a numbers guy when UPS pays you over 5 million and another company that you are on their board of directors pays you another 2 million?&nbsp; Got to be a numbers guy to count all those numbers in your checkbook.&nbsp; I also thought that &quot;management&quot; could not hold another job or positon while working for UPS due to a conflict of interest.&nbsp;&nbsp; How can you be totally focused on UPS&nbsp; when you have another duty to fulfill.&nbsp; But if you are the guy making the rules I guess you can do what you want to do.&nbsp; Look for an update to be announced about that change to our policy book too.&nbsp;Our company is stressed out to the max in every department.&nbsp; Our management teams operates scared of their jobs and perks.&nbsp; They put it on the people who actually make the wheels of this company roll.&nbsp; They know we are the ones that make it happen.&nbsp;&nbsp; They only look over what we do to tell us how we can do it better.&nbsp; The measure our measurements.&nbsp; What kind of production do you get out of that than to have something to do.&nbsp; Something unproductive to do.&nbsp; &nbsp;If they can do it so much better why don&#039;t they get out there and do it.&nbsp; They do this to be able to report to their supervisor that they are making improvements in their operations when they are only harrassing their workers.&nbsp; If they would leave us alone and let us actually do some working they may see some results.&nbsp; But the economy is difficult.&nbsp;I think we will see more and more conflict until our economy improves.&nbsp; In the meanwhile there will be casualities in all departments as a result of a manager &quot;improving&quot; their bottom line.&nbsp; Or so they think.&nbsp; If they really wanted to help, they would instead of causing a hostile work enviornment.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="tiegirl, post: 518165, member: 11669"] I do not work in a center however I think the current demands required by our top managment and I guess it comes from the very top down. As in, from our CEO, Scott Davis, who is a re hire. By the way did you get the update for our policy book that UPS will now rehire on a case by case basis. I guess that also come from the top down since the top is a rehire. From researching our CEO bio it is said he is a numbers guy. How can you not be a numbers guy when UPS pays you over 5 million and another company that you are on their board of directors pays you another 2 million? Got to be a numbers guy to count all those numbers in your checkbook. I also thought that "management" could not hold another job or positon while working for UPS due to a conflict of interest. How can you be totally focused on UPS when you have another duty to fulfill. But if you are the guy making the rules I guess you can do what you want to do. Look for an update to be announced about that change to our policy book too. Our company is stressed out to the max in every department. Our management teams operates scared of their jobs and perks. They put it on the people who actually make the wheels of this company roll. They know we are the ones that make it happen. They only look over what we do to tell us how we can do it better. The measure our measurements. What kind of production do you get out of that than to have something to do. Something unproductive to do. If they can do it so much better why don't they get out there and do it. They do this to be able to report to their supervisor that they are making improvements in their operations when they are only harrassing their workers. If they would leave us alone and let us actually do some working they may see some results. But the economy is difficult. I think we will see more and more conflict until our economy improves. In the meanwhile there will be casualities in all departments as a result of a manager "improving" their bottom line. Or so they think. If they really wanted to help, they would instead of causing a hostile work enviornment. [/QUOTE]

Verification