They have to make the cake, just no gay on it.First they got rid of Affirmative Action. Now the Supreme Court says it's OK for a small bakery to refuse to make a wedding cake for a couple of fags.
I suppose that is how it works. That still is much better than being forced to top it off with 2 guys for decorations.They have to make the cake, just no gay on it.
Now the Supreme Court says it's OK for a small bakery to refuse to make a wedding cake for a couple of fags.
theres no hope because isnt being an empire a terminal illness?
IDGAF what gays do, just don’t mess with kids. And stop with the filthy parades.@El Correcto isn't wrong about the presence of open hostility toward gay people on here.
I think the decision was correct simply because a Christian shouldn't be compelled to create a cake for a gay wedding. Even though I support gay weddings.
If Nazi’s can have a parade, why not a gay?IDGAF what gays do, just don’t mess with kids. And stop with the filthy parades.
IDGAF what gays do, just don’t mess with kids. And stop with the filthy parades.
If Nazi’s can have a parade, why not a gay?
500 billion every year spent on selling things to children by giant corporationsIDGAF what gays do, just don’t mess with kids. And stop with the filthy parades.
I believe the case was about a graphic designer refusing to participate in a gay wedding because they wanted homoerotic imagery. It wasn't enough to get standard wedding invitations that the designer had available. It's believed that the gays in question purposely sought out this business to force it to participate. SCOTUS made it clear that someone with a particular skill can't be forced to use that skill to ends they have disagreements with. It was overreach on the gays part and as I've pointed out elsewhere activists seeking to force their views on others are setting themselves up for backlash. They don't want Christians forcing their beliefs on their daily lives so they should abide by the same standard.@El Correcto isn't wrong about the presence of open hostility toward gay people on here.
I think the decision was correct simply because a Christian shouldn't be compelled to create a cake for a gay wedding. Even though I support gay weddings.
are nazis allowed to parade?
Disgusting
these idiot christians will sell pro war cakes but not gay ones lolI believe the case was about a graphic designer refusing to participate in a gay wedding because they wanted homoerotic imagery. It wasn't enough to get standard wedding invitations that the designer had available. It's believed that the gays in question purposely sought out this business to force it to participate. SCOTUS made it clear that someone with a particular skill can't be forced to use that skill to ends they have disagreements with. It was overreach on the gays part and as I've pointed out elsewhere activists seeking to force their views on others are setting themselves up for backlash. They don't want Christians forcing their beliefs on their daily lives so they should abide by the same standard.
Would you have them all run around naked so that corporations don't make a profit selling clothes?500 billion every year spent on selling things to children by giant corporations
Really, where is that happening?these idiot christians will sell pro war cakes but not gay ones lol
Not naked. Boobare nazis allowed to parade?
are nazis allowed to parade?
Now you are getting it------So you can’t discriminate when it helps a minority, but we can when it hurts them!! It’s a bigot’s dream come true!