Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="vantexan" data-source="post: 6090795" data-attributes="member: 24302"><p>I wouldn&#039;t say that.&nbsp; In the Soviet Union only a small percentage were in the Communist Party.&nbsp; But they controlled the guns.&nbsp; When they.were finally kicked out it was because a much larger mass of people rose up against them.&nbsp; The problem with pure democracy is once the population gets to a certain size, and spread over a large area, it&#039;s unwieldy.&nbsp; A representative republic is much more efficient.&nbsp; Same with [USER=56035]@rickyb[/USER] wanting labor having an equal say in how everything is done in a company.&nbsp; It&#039;s extremely inefficient and cumbersome.&nbsp; He thinks that&#039;s the ticket to getting high pay for much less time worked, with long periods off for recreation and relaxation.&nbsp; Unless a company has a license to print money that just won&#039;t happen.&nbsp; But can&#039;t tell him that.&nbsp; And anyone saying differently is evil and corrupt.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="vantexan, post: 6090795, member: 24302"] I wouldn't say that. In the Soviet Union only a small percentage were in the Communist Party. But they controlled the guns. When they.were finally kicked out it was because a much larger mass of people rose up against them. The problem with pure democracy is once the population gets to a certain size, and spread over a large area, it's unwieldy. A representative republic is much more efficient. Same with [USER=56035]@rickyb[/USER] wanting labor having an equal say in how everything is done in a company. It's extremely inefficient and cumbersome. He thinks that's the ticket to getting high pay for much less time worked, with long periods off for recreation and relaxation. Unless a company has a license to print money that just won't happen. But can't tell him that. And anyone saying differently is evil and corrupt. [/QUOTE]

Verification