Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="104Feeder" data-source="post: 4977716" data-attributes="member: 42554">A. No. Were there one available I would pay for it out of my own pocket. This isn&#039;t State or Federal court. The committees do not explain their decisions. B. No you cannot appeal the decision on any grounds. The actions speak for themselves. A typical, and expected outcome, is deadlock to arbitration.C. Yes. These were deadlocked at JALM, then deadlocked at the West. 2020 panel was backlogged due to Covid and Zoom limitations but the timeline is typical.D. They don&#039;t argue a loophole, they always claim it was unavoidable. In this case they changed exhibits which is a big no-no and typically would have angered the committee and caused it to be ruled against the violator.E.I don&#039;t know and it&#039;s irrelevant. JW is the chair and responsible for the Union response. The members aren&#039;t published but lucky for us he included it in his campaign resume though notably made the search terms difficult, putting &quot;Chairman of UPS air committee&quot; instead of &quot;National Air Committee&quot; which I find curious but admittedly speculative. <a href="https://unionly.io/o/teamstersunited/james-wright" target="_blank">James Wright - O&#039;Brien Zuckerman Teamsters United</a>To your other points, with my legal background the system is flawed for sure but partly by design. One described it as &quot;Nurses playing Doctor&quot; which is accurate.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="104Feeder, post: 4977716, member: 42554"] A. No. Were there one available I would pay for it out of my own pocket. This isn't State or Federal court. The committees do not explain their decisions. B. No you cannot appeal the decision on any grounds. The actions speak for themselves. A typical, and expected outcome, is deadlock to arbitration. C. Yes. These were deadlocked at JALM, then deadlocked at the West. 2020 panel was backlogged due to Covid and Zoom limitations but the timeline is typical. D. They don't argue a loophole, they always claim it was unavoidable. In this case they changed exhibits which is a big no-no and typically would have angered the committee and caused it to be ruled against the violator. E.I don't know and it's irrelevant. JW is the chair and responsible for the Union response. The members aren't published but lucky for us he included it in his campaign resume though notably made the search terms difficult, putting "Chairman of UPS air committee" instead of "National Air Committee" which I find curious but admittedly speculative. [URL="https://unionly.io/o/teamstersunited/james-wright"]James Wright - O'Brien Zuckerman Teamsters United[/URL] To your other points, with my legal background the system is flawed for sure but partly by design. One described it as "Nurses playing Doctor" which is accurate. [/QUOTE]

Verification