Oh lovely. Now we're really all Ground now.So we are getting rid of the different colors eh? All will be purple and orange with the operating company name underneath. Should help with customers getting confused. Haha
View attachment 93971
So we are getting rid of the different colors eh? All will be purple and orange with the operating company name underneath. Should help with customers getting confused. Haha
View attachment 93971
They say it's just branding and has nothing to do with operations. I find that hard to believe. As soon as they shot the HD dog they started pushing overlap and owning both services. We'll see where this goes.
I doubt they can make us all into contractors. They're going to turn all of us into little businessmen responsible for our own vehicles and taxes? Will we have to buy our rts? Aren't single rt owners really employees according to the courts? So they're going to have multiple rt owners and we're going to just meekly accept no benefits, less pay, no future at all? FedEx beat the Railroad Labor Act with Ground, but to convert Express over, which is highly doubtful legally, would probably destroy the company. They're turning a very nice profit now, do you really think they're going to mess with that? Dano is a liar by the way.If fedex decides to quit using contractors and hire employees, they will be able to use the vehicles when they ask to buy the trucks from contractors. Either that, or they can make all their employee express drivers into contractors and sell them the vehicles, which would make the contractor model more likely to pass legal scrutiny. Part of the reason that 'contractors' have been given the legal status of employee is because they do the exact same things as fedex express employees do. Once the full national transition to ISP is complete, there really is no reason to have a separate express division. ISPs can easily be forced to hire an extra pick up driver or two or three depending on size and be required to make timed deliveries. Think how much fedex would save just by not owning and maintaining an entire fleet of vehicles.
I doubt they can make us all into contractors. They're going to turn all of us into little businessmen responsible for our own vehicles and taxes? Will we have to buy our rts? Aren't single rt owners really employees according to the courts? So they're going to have multiple rt owners and we're going to just meekly accept no benefits, less pay, no future at all? FedEx beat the Railroad Labor Act with Ground, but to convert Express over, which is highly doubtful legally, would probably destroy the company. They're turning a very nice profit now, do you really think they're going to mess with that? Dano is a liar by the way.
If fedex decides to quit using contractors and hire employees, they will be able to use the vehicles when they ask to buy the trucks from contractors. Either that, or they can make all their employee express drivers into contractors and sell them the vehicles, which would make the contractor model more likely to pass legal scrutiny. Part of the reason that 'contractors' have been given the legal status of employee is because they do the exact same things as fedex express employees do. Once the full national transition to ISP is complete, there really is no reason to have a separate express division. ISPs can easily be forced to hire an extra pick up driver or two or three depending on size and be required to make timed deliveries. Think how much fedex would save just by not owning and maintaining an entire fleet of vehicles.
They don't have to pay anything if they don't want to because there is no binding collective bargaining agreement in place. They may have a severance policy but nothing binds them to it.If they changed express to contractors (essentially mass firing the entire workforce) would they have not have to pay every displaced employee severance?
They will have in the company's word 'get up to scale". An ISP is afforded proprietary rights in their area and that may give the the opportunity to buy into the express business in their geographic area or just have it handed to them with the same mandate as ISP's currently have. "Here's the business. Here are our terms . Either take it and get up to scale quickly or we cancel your contract and conscript the nearest contractor to take it."ISPs in certain places would need to hire a lot more than 2 or 3, your adding over 100 stops a day to each truck plus 30-40 pups a day depending on route and area
They would just lay off all the express drivers and allow ground to take on additional volume. Like we are with smartpost. Just roll it over and let us deal with it. Wouldn't be a big deal. Consolidate the routes even more.
They would just lay off all the express drivers and allow ground to take on additional volume. Like we are with smartpost. Just roll it over and let us deal with it. Wouldn't be a big deal. Consolidate the routes even more.
I thought Smartpost was linehauled directly from the shipper to a PO sorting facility without being handled by FedEx personnel.
We've started sorting smartpost in all our hubs. They are going to start giving us the deliveries when we are already going to a stop with a Ground box.I thought Smartpost was linehauled directly from the shipper to a PO sorting facility without being handled by FedEx personnel.
We've started sorting smartpost in all our hubs. They are going to start giving us the deliveries when we are already going to a stop with a Ground box.
I think with this rebranding they'll start to kick express saver and 2 day deliveries to us, half the customers think those services are ground anyway.
I don't see why not. Giving us their volume is a heck of a lot cheaper than maintaining a fleet and full time drivers with benefits.So Express is really going to be a part time opco?