Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="RuthlessSupSlayer" data-source="post: 3606450" data-attributes="member: 67092">I am still new as a driver and i do like having the OT my concern is losing my OT and not being guaranteed work.&nbsp; 1. Losing OT&nbsp; &nbsp; a. (speculating) No protection for hybrid drivers due to the 9.5 list so therefore it would behoove managment to max them each week or at least 50 hours per week. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 1a. So to alleviate excessive OT for FT the resolution is to create a lower class tier that runs into excessive overtime every week? Okay lets look at a probale senerio If a FT driver in 5 years get 5 hours of OT on average per week would gross $1900 at an even $40/hour VS a hybrid driver does 10 hours of OT at $34 per hour would gross $1870...so whats the point? Some could speculate that this strategy would be to eliminate a RPCD in lieu of a set up like FedEx where you load your own truck and go. &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; b. There has been no inside work minimum hours disclosed. This position needs at least 17.5 hours per week inside or 3.5 hours per day or a on road maximum. This would help (not resolve) the losing of OT. &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; c. If hybrid drivers are here to help the 9.5ers get in then fine. They should be only allowed to help 9.5 drivers and 8hr drivers. If a driver opts out of 9.5 then that route shall not be helped by a hybrid driver unless agreed upon managment and driver. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; d. Hybrid drivers should have the same rights to a 9.5 list as the people&#039;s job they are doing. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; e. If the progression of a Hybrid is the same a RPCD then that should change the Hybrid drivers should not make as much as someone in progression for RCPD or shorten the length. Otherwise theres no reason to be a rcpd.As it pertains to the guarantee of work that last little line of if work is available needs to go because this will be a cop out for managment to select tue drivers they want. This will cause layoffs which goes against what unions stand for.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="RuthlessSupSlayer, post: 3606450, member: 67092"] I am still new as a driver and i do like having the OT my concern is losing my OT and not being guaranteed work. 1. Losing OT a. (speculating) No protection for hybrid drivers due to the 9.5 list so therefore it would behoove managment to max them each week or at least 50 hours per week. 1a. So to alleviate excessive OT for FT the resolution is to create a lower class tier that runs into excessive overtime every week? Okay lets look at a probale senerio If a FT driver in 5 years get 5 hours of OT on average per week would gross $1900 at an even $40/hour VS a hybrid driver does 10 hours of OT at $34 per hour would gross $1870...so whats the point? Some could speculate that this strategy would be to eliminate a RPCD in lieu of a set up like FedEx where you load your own truck and go. b. There has been no inside work minimum hours disclosed. This position needs at least 17.5 hours per week inside or 3.5 hours per day or a on road maximum. This would help (not resolve) the losing of OT. c. If hybrid drivers are here to help the 9.5ers get in then fine. They should be only allowed to help 9.5 drivers and 8hr drivers. If a driver opts out of 9.5 then that route shall not be helped by a hybrid driver unless agreed upon managment and driver. d. Hybrid drivers should have the same rights to a 9.5 list as the people's job they are doing. e. If the progression of a Hybrid is the same a RPCD then that should change the Hybrid drivers should not make as much as someone in progression for RCPD or shorten the length. Otherwise theres no reason to be a rcpd. As it pertains to the guarantee of work that last little line of if work is available needs to go because this will be a cop out for managment to select tue drivers they want. This will cause layoffs which goes against what unions stand for. [/QUOTE]

Verification