Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Lineandinitial" data-source="post: 6064169" data-attributes="member: 29428">Yes it would. Non-resident? Resident within 60 days...There are multiple caveats, but your direct quote was:&quot;Interesting ruling. As I understand it, if this judge’s ruling is upheld, the FOID act is difficult to uphold. How would Brown legally obtain a firearm -------bought it out of stateif the ruling is that she legally owned it in her home? As the law stands now, she would have to illegally obtain the weapon to be able to have it in her home.--------key word you used is obtain and that is incorrect&nbsp;That obviously makes no sense.&quot;Illinois gives 60 days from &quot;establishing residency&quot; to obtain an ID. The gun could have been LEGALLY obtained outside of Illinois.I&#039;m splitting hairs, but my comments are based on what you wrote, and not what you possibly meant</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Lineandinitial, post: 6064169, member: 29428"] Yes it would. Non-resident? Resident within 60 days... There are multiple caveats, but your direct quote was: "Interesting ruling. As I understand it, if this judge’s ruling is upheld, the FOID act is difficult to uphold. How would Brown [B]legally obtain a firearm[/B] -------[SIZE=7][B][COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]bought it out of state[/COLOR][/B][/SIZE] if the ruling is that she legally owned it in her home? As the law stands now, [B]she would have to illegally obtain the weapon to be able to have it in her home[/B].--------[B][COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)][SIZE=7]key word you used is [U]obtain[/U] and that is incorrect[/SIZE][/COLOR][/B] That obviously makes no sense." Illinois gives 60 days from "establishing residency" to obtain an ID. The gun could have been LEGALLY obtained outside of Illinois. I'm splitting hairs, but my comments are based on what you wrote, and not what you possibly meant [/QUOTE]

Verification