Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Nys teamsters pension & retirement fund
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bubblehead" data-source="post: 3181151" data-attributes="member: 14176"><p>The government already bailed out those companies, GM being the most parallel, Dave, and subsequently/coincidentally it's pension.</p><p><a href="https://www.reuters.com/article/us-autos-gm-treasury/u-s-government-says-it-lost-11-2-billion-on-gm-bailout-idUSBREA3T0MR20140430" target="_blank">U.S. government says it lost $11.2 billion on GM bailout</a></p><p>Did you forget that and how does it not set a precedent?</p><p></p><p>There was nothing "<em>ambivalent</em>" about the notion of the government bailing out a private pension fund, like Central States, that was forced into a consent decree that provided for government oversight of a fund that subsequently tanked.</p><p></p><p>How can you assert that the government has no culpability while they had their hand in it???</p><p></p><p>Do you really believe half of what you post?</p><p>Is it ignorance, or are you just trolling counterpoints for your own cyber-amusement.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bubblehead, post: 3181151, member: 14176"] The government already bailed out those companies, GM being the most parallel, Dave, and subsequently/coincidentally it's pension. [URL='https://www.reuters.com/article/us-autos-gm-treasury/u-s-government-says-it-lost-11-2-billion-on-gm-bailout-idUSBREA3T0MR20140430']U.S. government says it lost $11.2 billion on GM bailout[/URL] Did you forget that and how does it not set a precedent? There was nothing "[I]ambivalent[/I]" about the notion of the government bailing out a private pension fund, like Central States, that was forced into a consent decree that provided for government oversight of a fund that subsequently tanked. How can you assert that the government has no culpability while they had their hand in it??? Do you really believe half of what you post? Is it ignorance, or are you just trolling counterpoints for your own cyber-amusement. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Nys teamsters pension & retirement fund
Top