Ocasio-Cortez and the “socialist” left

P

pickup

Guest
Look who’s never responding to me again is responding to me again! And he made a cute little acronym like the other third graders!

Well done picknose!

I responded to Old Man Jingle’s post, not yours. And while youre responding to me like a love sick teenager, I bet someone was able to express a thought in another thread without your blue meaning glove pouncing on it.
 

MrFedEx

Engorged Member
Ain't that the truth.

Neither can you. Jesus would be appalled at Donald Trump, assuming the Bible is real and true. It's kind of like the scene in Indiana Jones where Jones has to choose the cup Jesus would have chosen. Wisely, Jones picks the plainest, most unadorned cup and is spared.

Trump would have picked the gaudiest, rhinestone and diamond encrusted cup that looked like it belonged in a sleazy ghetto whorehouse.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
Agree. But Jesus might be even more appalled by the practice of aborting babies shortly before their natural births. Couldn't say for sure.
Doubt very seriously that Jesus would condone abortion for any reason except possibly to save the life of the mother. For rape and incest too.
 

Fred's Myth

Nonhyphenated American
Neither can you. Jesus would be appalled at Donald Trump, assuming the Bible is real and true. It's kind of like the scene in Indiana Jones where Jones has to choose the cup Jesus would have chosen. Wisely, Jones picks the plainest, most unadorned cup and is spared.

Trump would have picked the gaudiest, rhinestone and diamond encrusted cup that looked like it belonged in a sleazy ghetto whorehouse.
First your transference to Trump, now you speak for Jesus.

What a work of art.
 

tonyexpress

Whac-A-Troll Patrol
Staff member
The Green New Deal Will Hit the Poor With Higher Energy Costs

If a Green New Deal is ever implemented, says Mills, it would rob the poor by raising energy costs, while "giving money to wealthy people in the form of subsidies to buy $100,000 cars, to put expensive solar arrays on their roofs or to be investors in wind farms."

"It's upside-down Robin Hood," he adds. "That's a bad deal."

Yet a majority of Americans—including Republicans surveyed—say they support some version of it.
 

MAKAVELI

Well-Known Member
The Green New Deal Will Hit the Poor With Higher Energy Costs

If a Green New Deal is ever implemented, says Mills, it would rob the poor by raising energy costs, while "giving money to wealthy people in the form of subsidies to buy $100,000 cars, to put expensive solar arrays on their roofs or to be investors in wind farms."

"It's upside-down Robin Hood," he adds. "That's a bad deal."

Yet a majority of Americans—including Republicans surveyed—say they support some version of it.
Fake news
 
P

pickup

Guest
The Green New Deal Will Hit the Poor With Higher Energy Costs

If a Green New Deal is ever implemented, says Mills, it would rob the poor by raising energy costs, while "giving money to wealthy people in the form of subsidies to buy $100,000 cars, to put expensive solar arrays on their roofs or to be investors in wind farms."

"It's upside-down Robin Hood," he adds. "That's a bad deal."

Yet a majority of Americans—including Republicans surveyed—say they support some version of it.

Dude, that is even more of a reason for reparations, at least according to the Dem’s mentality.
 

Box Ox

Well-Known Member
The Green New Deal Will Hit the Poor With Higher Energy Costs

If a Green New Deal is ever implemented, says Mills, it would rob the poor by raising energy costs, while "giving money to wealthy people in the form of subsidies to buy $100,000 cars, to put expensive solar arrays on their roofs or to be investors in wind farms."

"It's upside-down Robin Hood," he adds. "That's a bad deal."

Yet a majority of Americans—including Republicans surveyed—say they support some version of it.

Fake news

Reason’s largest donors are the Sarah Scaife and Koch foundations. Both of whom have interests in pushing back against green anything. But it looks like they’re still into factual reporting.

Reason - Media Bias/Fact Check

“Overall, we rate Reason Magazine Right-Center biased based on story selection that favors Libertarian positions and High for factual reporting due to mostly proper sourcing and a clean fact check record. (7/16/2016) Updated (D. Van Zandt 10/19/2018)”
 

floridays

Well-Known Member
I see you struggle with facts.

1. I doubt that you can find a single time I have brought up the popular vote totals. It doesn’t matter. That’s not how presidential elections are scored.

2. It is a simple fact that the democrats were in the minority in all facets of the federal government after the 2016 election.

3. Van has insisted over and over that it is the democrats since the 2016 elections that spending remains out of control. To reiterate point 2, the democrats were the minority party.

4. I didn’t say republicans hate minorities. I say they blame minorities. Our president ran a successful campaign based on it.
I'm not Van, I fight his battles when I join in to support him, consider it a concurring opinion. The democrats are the minority party excepting the US House of representatives, agreed. Had you been content to leave it there, I would not responded. You made a backhand slap with the inclusion of the word "minorities." I guess that is a democrat "dog whistle." I know the meaning intended.

Please give one example of an elected republican blaming a minority for anything. I'm offering a chance at redemption, a chance to save face. I don't want some clowns interpretation of what someone said either.
 
Top