Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Doubleparkedrunner" data-source="post: 3611765" data-attributes="member: 71878">Maybe you should.&nbsp; I guess that&#039;s for each member to self evaluate what&#039;s important to them , like anything else in life I suppose. &nbsp;&nbsp; I for one feel grateful for all the ones who&#039;ve come before me and what they were all able to accomplish through their battles with the company and management over the decades. &nbsp;&nbsp; But that doesn&#039;t change the fact that ones words on here can really leave a sour taste in said newbies&#039; minds if not carefully thought out.&nbsp; &nbsp; Personally I&#039;m a no vote mostly because of a lot of the veterans on here who have so much mistrust in the company to hold their end of the bargain up as far as any wording in the contract and how they will twist or flat out ignore what&#039;s written in said contract. &nbsp;&nbsp; If it wasn&#039;t for this mistrust I think some of these proposals would actually be a win win for all involved.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Doubleparkedrunner, post: 3611765, member: 71878"] Maybe you should. I guess that's for each member to self evaluate what's important to them , like anything else in life I suppose. I for one feel grateful for all the ones who've come before me and what they were all able to accomplish through their battles with the company and management over the decades. But that doesn't change the fact that ones words on here can really leave a sour taste in said newbies' minds if not carefully thought out. Personally I'm a no vote mostly because of a lot of the veterans on here who have so much mistrust in the company to hold their end of the bargain up as far as any wording in the contract and how they will twist or flat out ignore what's written in said contract. If it wasn't for this mistrust I think some of these proposals would actually be a win win for all involved. [/QUOTE]

Verification