Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="bacha29" data-source="post: 5594251" data-attributes="member: 58386">All that extra spending should benefit the &quot;Red&#039; states . After all you were the one claiming that military spending made Red states recipient states.Now you have a Comptroller General and an Inspector General. However there has always been a certain hands off approach when it comes to how the military spends it&#039;s money.. They list their needs and an agreement as to the size of their budget is reached.At the same time it was announced that an accounting error was identified and corrected resulting in an additional 3 billion dollars in aide going to Ukraine. Will help to pay for F16&#039;s and training. And overnight China accused Micron of being a &quot;security risk&quot; as the US and it&#039;s western allies ramp up it&#039;s already accelerated efforts to decouple from China.Easy to see why there is a certain hands off approach to what the Pentagon is up to.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="bacha29, post: 5594251, member: 58386"] All that extra spending should benefit the "Red' states . After all you were the one claiming that military spending made Red states recipient states. Now you have a Comptroller General and an Inspector General. However there has always been a certain hands off approach when it comes to how the military spends it's money.. They list their needs and an agreement as to the size of their budget is reached. At the same time it was announced that an accounting error was identified and corrected resulting in an additional 3 billion dollars in aide going to Ukraine. Will help to pay for F16's and training. And overnight China accused Micron of being a "security risk" as the US and it's western allies ramp up it's already accelerated efforts to decouple from China. Easy to see why there is a certain hands off approach to what the Pentagon is up to. [/QUOTE]

Verification