Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Babagounj" data-source="post: 831363" data-attributes="member: 12952">Time to get this thread back on topic.<a href="http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article/570088/201104251849/Agnostics-Dreaded-Verdict-Birthers-Are-Mainly-Right.htm" target="_blank">http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article/570088/201104251849/Agnostics-Dreaded-Verdict-Birthers-Are-Mainly-Right.htm</a>I will give you the unpleasant punch line upfront: There is&nbsp; sufficient evidence to reasonably conclude that Barack Obama is probably&nbsp; not a U.S. citizen, therefore constitutionally ineligible to be&nbsp; president of the United States.&nbsp;The fact that he has been serving in that office would then be not&nbsp; only the most audacious hoax in world history — at least since the&nbsp; Trojan Horse. It also creates a constitutional crisis of the first&nbsp; magnitude that will take decades to straighten out.Some tidbits and apparent facts suggest, weakly, that the person now&nbsp; known as &quot;Barack Obama&quot; is a natural-born citizen. (If George W. Bush or&nbsp; any other politician had used as many aliases as B.H. Obama has, he&nbsp; would have been laughed out of politics in short order. Need we even&nbsp; suggest the basis for the double standard, enforced primarily by a&nbsp; compliant media?)If B.H. Obama is a natural-born U.S. citizen, those who flack for him&nbsp; should be able to do better than the unpersuasive defense they have&nbsp; offered. More specifically damning, haven&#039;t you noticed how Obama apologists&nbsp; rarely offer a substantive argument for his citizenship at all, but&nbsp; instead use personal attack, invective, sophistry, demagogy and&nbsp; ridicule? The bottom line: If you believe that the artist formerly known&nbsp; as Barry Soetoro really is a natural U.S. citizen, prove it.&nbsp; If the&nbsp; subject of the controversy cannot, others are not likely to be able to&nbsp; either.The conclusion: Barack Obama&#039;s covered-up background is very likely&nbsp; sufficient to disqualify him from the presidency, perhaps or perhaps not&nbsp; constitutionally through noncitizenship, or more practically because of&nbsp; multiple acts of fraud and deceit over legal name and multiple&nbsp; citizenships. Full public knowledge would surely induce prompt&nbsp; impeachment or electoral pariah status, that is.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Babagounj, post: 831363, member: 12952"] [COLOR=purple]Time to get this thread back on topic. [url]http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article/570088/201104251849/Agnostics-Dreaded-Verdict-Birthers-Are-Mainly-Right.htm[/url] [/COLOR]I will give you the unpleasant punch line upfront: There is sufficient evidence to reasonably conclude that Barack Obama is probably not a U.S. citizen, therefore constitutionally ineligible to be president of the United States. The fact that he has been serving in that office would then be not only the most audacious hoax in world history — at least since the Trojan Horse. It also creates a constitutional crisis of the first magnitude that will take decades to straighten out. Some tidbits and apparent facts suggest, weakly, that the person now known as "Barack Obama" is a natural-born citizen. (If George W. Bush or any other politician had used as many aliases as B.H. Obama has, he would have been laughed out of politics in short order. Need we even suggest the basis for the double standard, enforced primarily by a compliant media?) If B.H. Obama is a natural-born U.S. citizen, those who flack for him should be able to do better than the unpersuasive defense they have offered. More specifically damning, haven't you noticed how Obama apologists rarely offer a substantive argument for his citizenship at all, but instead use personal attack, invective, sophistry, demagogy and ridicule? The bottom line: If you believe that the artist formerly known as Barry Soetoro really is a natural U.S. citizen, prove it. If the subject of the controversy cannot, others are not likely to be able to either. The conclusion: Barack Obama's covered-up background is very likely sufficient to disqualify him from the presidency, perhaps or perhaps not constitutionally through noncitizenship, or more practically because of multiple acts of fraud and deceit over legal name and multiple citizenships. Full public knowledge would surely induce prompt impeachment or electoral pariah status, that is. [/QUOTE]

Verification