Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Babagounj" data-source="post: 832879" data-attributes="member: 12952">So the WH releases some document which most&nbsp; take as natural fact, and the MSM again fail to do it&#039;s job. How come everyone thinks that this story is over?No one is concerned enough to ask why were so many private and taxpaying lawyers spend the last few years making sure this document was never seen ?..........................................................................Sadly, if what is represented on this new &quot;birth certificate&quot; is an&nbsp; accurate representation of Obama&#039;s&#039; actual birth, it does not prove he is&nbsp; eligible to be president, but just the opposite.&nbsp; BHO,sr is listed as the birth father, thus the child would be a dual-citizen and there was no way he was eligible to run for office.Anyone who has ever been involved in an adoption knows a few things most others don&#039;t know.&nbsp; When an adoption takes place in the U.S., the original birth certificate is either amended or replaced entirely with a new document that shows the adoptive parent or parents as the birth parents. 

&nbsp; Question: Why is the adoption of Barack Obama not noted in the original long-form birth certificate released by the White House this week?&nbsp; We can hypothesize, of course, since no member of the media has&nbsp; bothered to ask the question. Let&#039;s guess that the adoption took place&nbsp; in Indonesia and Hawaii authorities were never notified. Does that&nbsp; change the reality of the adoption itself? Of course not. But it does&nbsp; invalidate the document we all saw this week for the first time. It is&nbsp; not an accurate reflection of the most basic facts needed to determine&nbsp; Obama&#039;s eligibility for the presidency. That document should list Indonesian citizen Lolo Soetoro as his father – not Kenyan Obama.&nbsp; So here we have a man sitting in the White House who has two&nbsp; fathers – neither of which is able to confer U.S. citizenship on their&nbsp; son.&nbsp; 
Read more: <a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=292553#ixzz1L0siOfDS" target="_blank">It&#039;s settled! Obama&#039;s ineligible</a> <a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=292553#ixzz1L0siOfDS" target="_blank">http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=292553#ixzz1L0siOfDS</a>





</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Babagounj, post: 832879, member: 12952"] So the WH releases some document which most take as natural fact, and the MSM again fail to do it's job. How come everyone thinks that this story is over? No one is concerned enough to ask why were so many private and taxpaying lawyers spend the last few years making sure this document was never seen ? .......................................................................... Sadly, if what is represented on this new "birth certificate" is an accurate representation of Obama's' actual birth, it does not prove he is eligible to be president, but just the opposite. BHO,sr is listed as the birth father, thus the child would be a dual-citizen and there was no way he was eligible to run for office. Anyone who has ever been involved in an adoption knows a few things most others don't know. When an adoption takes place in the U.S., the original birth certificate is either amended or replaced entirely with a new document that shows the adoptive parent or parents as the birth parents. [LEFT][COLOR=#000000] [/COLOR][/LEFT] Question: Why is the adoption of Barack Obama not noted in the original long-form birth certificate released by the White House this week? We can hypothesize, of course, since no member of the media has bothered to ask the question. Let's guess that the adoption took place in Indonesia and Hawaii authorities were never notified. Does that change the reality of the adoption itself? Of course not. But it does invalidate the document we all saw this week for the first time. It is not an accurate reflection of the most basic facts needed to determine Obama's eligibility for the presidency. That document should list Indonesian citizen Lolo Soetoro as his father – not Kenyan Obama. So here we have a man sitting in the White House who has two fathers – neither of which is able to confer U.S. citizenship on their son. [LEFT][COLOR=#000000] Read more: [URL="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=292553#ixzz1L0siOfDS"]It's settled! Obama's ineligible[/URL] [URL]http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=292553#ixzz1L0siOfDS[/URL] [/COLOR] [COLOR=#000000] [/COLOR][/LEFT] [/QUOTE]

Verification