Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Nimnim" data-source="post: 1177573" data-attributes="member: 28856">I took some time to think about how to respond to this after getting some sleep. I&#039;m still not completely comfortable with my responses, mainly because I&#039;m not sure how to word it, and second some of what you say I see as an opinion I don&#039;t know how to respond to.You say it&#039;s not implemented yet, which is partially true. Some parts have been put into action, others are scheduled later, and others have been given extensions to their implementation.You also say &quot;there is nothing stopping the American population from insistin on changes to parts the don&#039;t like about it once it is implemented.&quot; To me if this was a viable option, this law wouldn&#039;t be in place as it is. If the American population were able to weigh in on the law before it was passed we&#039;d have much less issues with it. As I see it, even if things are implemented and the American populous has a problem with it, the lawmakers in power will ignore the concerns, much like they did when the law was being passed.The rest of your post feels like a halfhearted semi talking point driven series of statements. I&#039;m sure I could argue more, but it just doesn&#039;t feel coherent in response.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Nimnim, post: 1177573, member: 28856"] I took some time to think about how to respond to this after getting some sleep. I'm still not completely comfortable with my responses, mainly because I'm not sure how to word it, and second some of what you say I see as an opinion I don't know how to respond to. You say it's not implemented yet, which is partially true. Some parts have been put into action, others are scheduled later, and others have been given extensions to their implementation. You also say "[COLOR=#000000]there is nothing stopping the American population from insistin on changes to parts the don't like about it once it is implemented.[/COLOR][COLOR=#000000]" To me if this was a viable option, this law wouldn't be in place as it is. If the American population were able to weigh in on the law before it was passed we'd have much less issues with it. As I see it, even if things are implemented and the American populous has a problem with it, the lawmakers in power will ignore the concerns, much like they did when the law was being passed. The rest of your post feels like a halfhearted semi talking point driven series of statements. I'm sure I could argue more, but it just doesn't feel coherent in response.[/COLOR] [/QUOTE]

Verification