Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="wkmac" data-source="post: 1976093" data-attributes="member: 2189">The difference between you and I is that you seem to think we do need someone to lead us around by our nose rings.&nbsp; I question the need of nose rings to begin with.&nbsp; I think the best solution to the office of the President is to abolish it completely.&nbsp; Now you may have a better idea of what I think of Obama or for that matter any other person who might or would hold that office.&nbsp; Changing the person in the office is just as effective as changing the furniture because regardless of either one, the outcome will always be the same as it relates to common folk.To complain about the expense of $3.5 million may well be a legit complaint. But seems to me if the Son-of-a-Bitch is out of town unable to spend billions, using economics and best use of resources based on available options, I say let the Son-a-of-Bitch along with the other Sons-of-Bitches stay on vacation.&nbsp; Maybe at some point people will then go the next step and save the $3.5 million too.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="wkmac, post: 1976093, member: 2189"] The difference between you and I is that you seem to think we do need someone to lead us around by our nose rings. I question the need of nose rings to begin with. I think the best solution to the office of the President is to abolish it completely. Now you may have a better idea of what I think of Obama or for that matter any other person who might or would hold that office. Changing the person in the office is just as effective as changing the furniture because regardless of either one, the outcome will always be the same as it relates to common folk. To complain about the expense of $3.5 million may well be a legit complaint. But seems to me if the Son-of-a-Bitch is out of town unable to spend billions, using economics and best use of resources based on available options, I say let the Son-a-of-Bitch along with the other Sons-of-Bitches stay on vacation. Maybe at some point people will then go the next step and save the $3.5 million too. [/QUOTE]

Verification