Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="diesel96" data-source="post: 784265" data-attributes="member: 9859">Actually, earmarks represent about 1% of discretionary spending....Is it really about Earmarks (which both sides uitilizes) or republicans yearning for Obama&#039;s Waterloo in anticipation to recapture the WhiteHouse in 2012, even at the expense of our veterans families and 9/11 heros.. &nbsp;&nbsp;Agree, however, why exclude the consequences of posting false claims and portray them as fact.....This is a practise that frequently occurs in internet blogs, threads, and chain e-mails and should be dealt with a harsh dose of polite reality to whomever authors the post and is exposed....&nbsp;Sarah Palin for example, why does she get thumped by commentators and political junkies ? Well making claims such as &quot;Death Panels&quot; and &quot;Paling around with Terrorist&quot; has it&#039;s consequenses with easy rebuttle and push back for the hopey-changey ex-Gov of Alaska...</blockquote>

[QUOTE="diesel96, post: 784265, member: 9859"] Actually, earmarks represent about 1% of discretionary spending....Is it really about Earmarks (which both sides uitilizes) or republicans yearning for Obama's Waterloo in anticipation to recapture the WhiteHouse in 2012, even at the expense of our veterans families and 9/11 heros.. Agree, however, why exclude the consequences of posting false claims and portray them as fact.....This is a practise that frequently occurs in internet blogs, threads, and chain e-mails and should be dealt with a harsh dose of polite reality to whomever authors the post and is exposed.... Sarah Palin for example, why does she get thumped by commentators and political junkies ? Well making claims such as "Death Panels" and "Paling around with Terrorist" has it's consequenses with easy rebuttle and push back for the hopey-changey ex-Gov of Alaska... [/QUOTE]

Verification