Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Babagounj" data-source="post: 787351" data-attributes="member: 12952">One of the largest union-administered health-insurance funds in New&nbsp; York is dropping coverage for the children of more than 30,000 low-wage&nbsp; home attendants, union officials said. The union blamed financial&nbsp; problems it said were caused by the state’s health department and new&nbsp; national health-insurance requirements.&nbsp;The fund is administered by 1199SEIU United Healthcare Workers East,&nbsp; an affiliate of the Service Employees International Union. Union&nbsp; officials said the state compelled the fund to start buying coverage&nbsp; from a third party, which increased premiums by 60%. State health&nbsp; officials denied forcing the union fund to make the switch, saying the&nbsp; fund had been struggling financially even before the switch to&nbsp; third-party coverage.&nbsp;The fund informed its members late last month that their dependents&nbsp; will no longer be covered as of Jan. 1, 2011. Currently about 6,000&nbsp; children are covered by the benefit fund, some until age 23.<a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/metropolis/2010/11/20/union-drops-health-coverage-for-workers-children/" target="_blank">http://blogs.wsj.com/metropolis/2010/11/20/union-drops-health-coverage-for-workers-children/</a></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Babagounj, post: 787351, member: 12952"] One of the largest union-administered health-insurance funds in New York is dropping coverage for the children of more than 30,000 low-wage home attendants, union officials said. The union blamed financial problems it said were caused by the state’s health department and new national health-insurance requirements. The fund is administered by 1199SEIU United Healthcare Workers East, an affiliate of the Service Employees International Union. Union officials said the state compelled the fund to start buying coverage from a third party, which increased premiums by 60%. State health officials denied forcing the union fund to make the switch, saying the fund had been struggling financially even before the switch to third-party coverage. The fund informed its members late last month that their dependents will no longer be covered as of Jan. 1, 2011. Currently about 6,000 children are covered by the benefit fund, some until age 23. [url]http://blogs.wsj.com/metropolis/2010/11/20/union-drops-health-coverage-for-workers-children/[/url] [/QUOTE]

Verification