Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="curiousbrain" data-source="post: 945548" data-attributes="member: 31608">Re: ObamanomicsNot that I was flustered, but let&#039;s assume I was (which is fine by me) -&nbsp; what flusters me is not the percentage of profits point (and I use&nbsp; &quot;point&quot; loosely), but rather your basic inability to digest the&nbsp; counterpoint of anyone that is not completely in line with your own. I&nbsp; do not dislike you on any personal level for this reason, but I do think&nbsp; that your political intelligence is something my dog would find&nbsp; amusing.That previous snipe aside, allow me to dig a little deeper into this&nbsp; point - maybe I will be silenced by the &quot;Mods that be&quot; and maybe I&nbsp; won&#039;t. You have an intense veracity regarding your political beliefs,&nbsp; and that is fine - but it should also occur to you that others have&nbsp; their own beliefs. And, this is my primary point, the ability to&nbsp; reproduce internet links that offer substance to your own political&nbsp; beliefs is not political debate. Let me repeat that: the amount of&nbsp; internet links is not proportional to the validity of ones belief.To address the issue you raised about the &quot;dominant&quot; poster, you totally&nbsp; missed the point - what Upstate was saying (dare I speak for him, he is&nbsp; free to correct me) is that you blunder around the forums, chiming in&nbsp; on every single topic from dogs to UPS management, from cats to loading&nbsp; Package Cars, and many more (nevermind the fact that I&#039;m fairly confident you have never attempted any of these UPS-related tasks). Which is, technically, your right, but&nbsp; consider it from a common sense perspective: just because you can do&nbsp; certain things, doesn&#039;t mean you should. I could go into work and punch&nbsp; my boss in the face, but I don&#039;t - so it is with posting in every&nbsp; thread.Let me be the first to admit that I am wrong from time to time - or&nbsp; maybe all the time. The thing which I would highlight is that when I am&nbsp; wrong, I process that information and think about why I was wrong, and&nbsp; then I move on in life and grow as a person; what I do not do is to&nbsp; pretend that I am the master of debate in some political fantasy land.To bring this back to political land, believe it or not I am a conservative in many respects - economic, being the first and foremost. However, when people (such as yourself) demonstrate that you have an excommunication from political logic, I wouldn&#039;t dare put myself in that camp.Am I making this post because I am a mean-hearted SOB? Hardly; rather, this is what you have asked for, this is what you have wrought, by your continued chastising of almost every thread around here; yes, you have been here forever and ten days, and that is commendable, but that doesn&#039;t mean that you are not, without exception, the most outstandingly annoying person on this entire forum.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="curiousbrain, post: 945548, member: 31608"] [b]Re: Obamanomics[/b] Not that I was flustered, but let's assume I was (which is fine by me) - what flusters me is not the percentage of profits point (and I use "point" loosely), but rather your basic inability to digest the counterpoint of anyone that is not completely in line with your own. I do not dislike you on any personal level for this reason, but I do think that your political intelligence is something my dog would find amusing. That previous snipe aside, allow me to dig a little deeper into this point - maybe I will be silenced by the "Mods that be" and maybe I won't. You have an intense veracity regarding your political beliefs, and that is fine - but it should also occur to you that others have their own beliefs. And, this is my primary point, the ability to reproduce internet links that offer substance to your own political beliefs is not political debate. Let me repeat that: the amount of internet links is not proportional to the validity of ones belief. To address the issue you raised about the "dominant" poster, you totally missed the point - what Upstate was saying (dare I speak for him, he is free to correct me) is that you blunder around the forums, chiming in on every single topic from dogs to UPS management, from cats to loading Package Cars, and many more (nevermind the fact that I'm fairly confident you have never attempted any of these UPS-related tasks). Which is, technically, your right, but consider it from a common sense perspective: just because you can do certain things, doesn't mean you should. I could go into work and punch my boss in the face, but I don't - so it is with posting in every thread. Let me be the first to admit that I am wrong from time to time - or maybe all the time. The thing which I would highlight is that when I am wrong, I process that information and think about why I was wrong, and then I move on in life and grow as a person; what I do not do is to pretend that I am the master of debate in some political fantasy land. To bring this back to political land, believe it or not I am a conservative in many respects - economic, being the first and foremost. However, when people (such as yourself) demonstrate that you have an excommunication from political logic, I wouldn't dare put myself in that camp. Am I making this post because I am a mean-hearted SOB? Hardly; rather, this is what you have asked for, this is what you have wrought, by your continued chastising of almost every thread around here; yes, you have been here forever and ten days, and that is commendable, but that doesn't mean that you are not, without exception, the most outstandingly annoying person on this entire forum. [/QUOTE]

Verification