Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
President Obama!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Other Side" data-source="post: 993328" data-attributes="member: 17969"><p><strong>Re: Obamanomics</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>another fine contribution to the debate. Lets look at one of the claims in your post.</p><p></p><p>[h=3]New Zealand[/h]Stimulus Funds</p><p></p><p>A $817,000 Stimulus Contract Was Awarded To New Zealand's Connexionz To Install Bus Monitors For The City Of Santa Clarita. A Local Contractor That Could Have Performed The Work Objected To The Funds Going Overseas.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local/Stimulus-Money-Awarded-Overseas-Local-Business-Loses-Protest--145859375.html" target="_blank">Santa Clarita Rejects Protest, New Zealand Company Keeps Stimulus Contract | NBC Southern California</a></p><p></p><p></p><p>Now lets look at the facts. There were many bids submitted for the project, A New Zealand company called Connexionz submitted the LOWEST BID of ALL companies for this stimulus money saving the TAXPAYERS hundreds of thousands of dollars.</p><p></p><p>The Company, USED AMERICAN WORKERS, AMERICAN PARTS and worked in an AMERICAN CITY.</p><p></p><p>The fact is that this move SAVED TAX DOLLARS, and isnt that your complaint on every other issue of spending?</p><p></p><p>What would you prefer, the contract going to a bid that would have spent hundreds of thousands of dollars more costing YOU the taxpayer more money?</p><p></p><p>get a grip.</p><p></p><p>You complain about the high speed rail costing too much, and when a city makes a move to take a lower bid saving money, you still complain.</p><p></p><p>Talk about being led to a road to nowhere.</p><p></p><p>Peace</p><p></p><p>TOS</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Other Side, post: 993328, member: 17969"] [b]Re: Obamanomics[/b] another fine contribution to the debate. Lets look at one of the claims in your post. [h=3]New Zealand[/h]Stimulus Funds A $817,000 Stimulus Contract Was Awarded To New Zealand's Connexionz To Install Bus Monitors For The City Of Santa Clarita. A Local Contractor That Could Have Performed The Work Objected To The Funds Going Overseas. [url=http://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local/Stimulus-Money-Awarded-Overseas-Local-Business-Loses-Protest--145859375.html]Santa Clarita Rejects Protest, New Zealand Company Keeps Stimulus Contract | NBC Southern California[/url] Now lets look at the facts. There were many bids submitted for the project, A New Zealand company called Connexionz submitted the LOWEST BID of ALL companies for this stimulus money saving the TAXPAYERS hundreds of thousands of dollars. The Company, USED AMERICAN WORKERS, AMERICAN PARTS and worked in an AMERICAN CITY. The fact is that this move SAVED TAX DOLLARS, and isnt that your complaint on every other issue of spending? What would you prefer, the contract going to a bid that would have spent hundreds of thousands of dollars more costing YOU the taxpayer more money? get a grip. You complain about the high speed rail costing too much, and when a city makes a move to take a lower bid saving money, you still complain. Talk about being led to a road to nowhere. Peace TOS [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
President Obama!
Top