Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Meat" data-source="post: 3904998" data-attributes="member: 61324">It is astounding how the general public has been conditioned to accept corruption.We know that a) the president openly admitted he fired Comey due to the Russian investigation (please explain how this is not considered obstruction) b) the president and his representatives lied about the nature of the Trump tower meeting with a Russian operative AND the fact that the president personally authored his son’s response regarding the meeting c) the president let his agent deceive congress on his behalf in regards to the construction of a Trump property in Moscow (ten years ago, this would have been an impeachable offense) d) Trump’s campaign manager shared polling info with a Russian intelligence agent (standard operating procedure?) e) Trump attempted to conceal the content of his discussions with Putin on numerous occasions.These factual circumstances aren’t what you would consider “ominous”?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Meat, post: 3904998, member: 61324"] It is astounding how the general public has been conditioned to accept corruption. We know that a) the president openly admitted he fired Comey due to the Russian investigation (please explain how this is not considered obstruction) b) the president and his representatives lied about the nature of the Trump tower meeting with a Russian operative AND the fact that the president personally authored his son’s response regarding the meeting c) the president let his agent deceive congress on his behalf in regards to the construction of a Trump property in Moscow (ten years ago, this would have been an impeachable offense) d) Trump’s campaign manager shared polling info with a Russian intelligence agent (standard operating procedure?) e) Trump attempted to conceal the content of his discussions with Putin on numerous occasions. These factual circumstances aren’t what you would consider “ominous”? [/QUOTE]

Verification