Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="vantexan" data-source="post: 3905781" data-attributes="member: 24302">Your ignorance is beginning to disgust me. Are you asserting they didn’t originally state the meeting was pertaining exclusively to the laws affecting the adoption of Russian children?Why? Because I didn’t state an ALLEGED Russian agent?Under what circumstances would releasing such info to any foreign national be appropriate? As inspector Todd would say, “This whole thing STINKS to high heaven”.Sounds like he may have been getting a little pushy with the translator. A little strange given the factual context, don’t you think?</blockquote>Steele admitted in British court under oath that the dossier couldn&#039;t be corroborated.&nbsp; That&#039;s at the heart of all of this.&nbsp; Newfie was spot on in his reply.&nbsp; Your side just desperately wants to believe the lie to justify your belief the election was essentially stolen.&nbsp; Don&#039;t be surprised if Mueller drags this on a good deal longer in hopes of affecting 2020.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE="vantexan, post: 3905781, member: 24302"] Your ignorance is beginning to disgust me. Are you asserting they didn’t originally state the meeting was pertaining exclusively to the laws affecting the adoption of Russian children? Why? Because I didn’t state an ALLEGED Russian agent? Under what circumstances would releasing such info to any foreign national be appropriate? As inspector Todd would say, “This whole thing STINKS to high heaven”. Sounds like he may have been getting a little pushy with the translator. A little strange given the factual context, don’t you think?[/QUOTE] Steele admitted in British court under oath that the dossier couldn't be corroborated. That's at the heart of all of this. Newfie was spot on in his reply. Your side just desperately wants to believe the lie to justify your belief the election was essentially stolen. Don't be surprised if Mueller drags this on a good deal longer in hopes of affecting 2020. [/QUOTE]

Verification