Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="LarryBird" data-source="post: 4073942" data-attributes="member: 76548">Trump will not carry PA or Michigan or Wisconsin this next election - the only thing that allowed him to steal them in 2016 was Democratic apathy towards Hillary and/or the sense that their vote wasn&#039;t crucial because of the landslide predicted by every poll. Those apathetic voters will not make the same mistake twice. I predict record swing state turnout for dems in 2020, and if I&#039;m correct, there&#039;s not a road to re-election for the orange blunder - just like there shouldn&#039;t have been in 2016.People are scared <img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/group1/censored2.gif"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":censored2:" title="Censored2&nbsp; &nbsp; :censored2:" data-shortname=":censored2:" />less, and regardless of what candidate the dems run out there this time, they will get in lockstep and remedy this situation.I wish Richard Clarke would run, although I know he isn&#039;t and will never in the future. But hopefully he gets a cabinet level position, which I expect he would accept, because he&#039;s been one of the smartest men in government for the past 30 years. He also has a lot of respect from republicans, as he&#039;s served in their administrations, which could&#039;ve served as one of the uniting factors we desperately need in these <img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/group1/censored2.gif"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":censored2:" title="Censored2&nbsp; &nbsp; :censored2:" data-shortname=":censored2:" />ed up times.He&#039;s too honest and proud to corrupt himself and play the game though. So he would basically have no chance. He&#039;s definitely smart enough to know that he&#039;s too smart to appeal to the half-tards our country relies upon to get elected. He&#039;s one of those smartest guy in the room types that rural America would never get behind.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="LarryBird, post: 4073942, member: 76548"] Trump will not carry PA or Michigan or Wisconsin this next election - the only thing that allowed him to steal them in 2016 was Democratic apathy towards Hillary and/or the sense that their vote wasn't crucial because of the landslide predicted by every poll. Those apathetic voters will not make the same mistake twice. I predict record swing state turnout for dems in 2020, and if I'm correct, there's not a road to re-election for the orange blunder - just like there shouldn't have been in 2016. People are scared :censored:less, and regardless of what candidate the dems run out there this time, they will get in lockstep and remedy this situation. I wish Richard Clarke would run, although I know he isn't and will never in the future. But hopefully he gets a cabinet level position, which I expect he would accept, because he's been one of the smartest men in government for the past 30 years. He also has a lot of respect from republicans, as he's served in their administrations, which could've served as one of the uniting factors we desperately need in these :censored:ed up times. He's too honest and proud to corrupt himself and play the game though. So he would basically have no chance. He's definitely smart enough to know that he's too smart to appeal to the half-tards our country relies upon to get elected. He's one of those smartest guy in the room types that rural America would never get behind. [/QUOTE]

Verification