Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="refineryworker05" data-source="post: 4726135" data-attributes="member: 66082">Lol you really don&#039;t understand the difference between say facebook and a newspaper?&nbsp; So newspapers pay people called reporters or columinists to produce whats in the newspaper, they have an editorial process a legal process to review all whats put in the newspaper.Facebook doesn&#039;t produce content, individual users of facebook produce content.&nbsp; That means facebook doesn&#039;t have an editorial process over what its users post and they reason facebook can exist in this way is because of section 230.&nbsp; If you take that away and make facebook legally responsible for anything any user puts on facebook, then facebook will ban a lot more content from users.&nbsp; As far as those &quot;lawsuits&quot;, what good have they done from the perspective of republicans?&nbsp; Do republicans trust the reality based media?&nbsp; No, do republicans still believe the reality based media is against them yes.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="refineryworker05, post: 4726135, member: 66082"] Lol you really don't understand the difference between say facebook and a newspaper? So newspapers pay people called reporters or columinists to produce whats in the newspaper, they have an editorial process a legal process to review all whats put in the newspaper. Facebook doesn't produce content, individual users of facebook produce content. That means facebook doesn't have an editorial process over what its users post and they reason facebook can exist in this way is because of section 230. If you take that away and make facebook legally responsible for anything any user puts on facebook, then facebook will ban a lot more content from users. As far as those "lawsuits", what good have they done from the perspective of republicans? Do republicans trust the reality based media? No, do republicans still believe the reality based media is against them yes. [/QUOTE]

Verification