Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="newfie" data-source="post: 5410488" data-attributes="member: 58700">the problem with this argument by a supposedly unbiased court is they have not themselves reviewed each document , nor listened to arguments as to ownership. They have thus decided to listen to one side the DOJ to make that determination.ownership of said documents would still have to be at the time of initial possession.The DOJ or intelligence community can claim ownership or even reclassify those documents post presidency&nbsp; but at the time of initial possession those documents were acquired and possessed by a sitting president of the united states.&nbsp;As such the process once that Potus leaves office is the determination of ownership which in the past has always been an amicable negotiation that in Obama&#039;s case has still not been resolved but did not require an armed raid.in this case since it is Trump and the current administration needed a distraction away from their miserable performance results they went to the extreme of turning those negotiations into an armed inssurection of a former president to try to deny him rights that were clearly spelled out during the time of nixon and beyond specifically for former presidents.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="newfie, post: 5410488, member: 58700"] the problem with this argument by a supposedly unbiased court is they have not themselves reviewed each document , nor listened to arguments as to ownership. They have thus decided to listen to one side the DOJ to make that determination. ownership of said documents would still have to be at the time of initial possession. The DOJ or intelligence community can claim ownership or even reclassify those documents post presidency but at the time of initial possession those documents were acquired and possessed by a sitting president of the united states. As such the process once that Potus leaves office is the determination of ownership which in the past has always been an amicable negotiation that in Obama's case has still not been resolved but did not require an armed raid. in this case since it is Trump and the current administration needed a distraction away from their miserable performance results they went to the extreme of turning those negotiations into an armed inssurection of a former president to try to deny him rights that were clearly spelled out during the time of nixon and beyond specifically for former presidents. [/QUOTE]

Verification