Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
REAL CLEAR POLITICS..... polls and tracking!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lue C Fur" data-source="post: 1047349" data-attributes="member: 25159"><p><span style="color: #0000CD">This is interesting:</span></p><p><span style="color: #0000CD"></span></p><p><span style="color: #0000CD"></span><span style="color: #000000"><span style="font-size: 12px"><strong>Government spending’s misleading impact on GDP</strong></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"><span style="font-size: 12px"><strong></strong></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"><span style="font-size: 12px"><strong></strong></span></span><span style="color: #000000"><em>On Oct. 26, the Bureau of Economic Analysis’ advance estimate of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in the 3rd quarter (Q3) of 2012 showed 2 percent growth — not really a good number.</em></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"><em>Just to get to the 3 percent annual growth rate the Obama Administration had originally forecast at the beginning of the year, the economy would have to grow at an annualized pace of 6.7 percent in the fourth quarter — something not likely to happen.</em></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"><em>In fact, the numbers look even worse upon examining the fine print, because 20 percent of the <u>nominal </u>increase in GDP was attributable to <strong>increased government spending.</strong> If government spending had held steady, as it had the prior two quarters, growth would have only come in at a reported <strong>1.6 percent</strong>.</em></span></p><p><span style="color: #0000CD"></span></p><p><span style="color: #0000CD">Read more at NetRightDaily.com: <a href="http://netrightdaily.com/2012/10/government-spendings-big-impact-on-gdp/#ixzz2AiRHHDyN" target="_blank">NetRight Daily Government spending’s misleading impact on GDP</a></span></p><p><span style="color: #0000CD"></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lue C Fur, post: 1047349, member: 25159"] [COLOR=#0000CD]This is interesting: [/COLOR][COLOR=#000000][SIZE=3][B]Government spending’s misleading impact on GDP [/B][/SIZE][/COLOR][COLOR=#0000CD][/COLOR][COLOR=#000000][I]On Oct. 26, the Bureau of Economic Analysis’ advance estimate of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in the 3rd quarter (Q3) of 2012 showed 2 percent growth — not really a good number.[/I][/COLOR] [COLOR=#000000][I]Just to get to the 3 percent annual growth rate the Obama Administration had originally forecast at the beginning of the year, the economy would have to grow at an annualized pace of 6.7 percent in the fourth quarter — something not likely to happen.[/I][/COLOR] [COLOR=#000000][I]In fact, the numbers look even worse upon examining the fine print, because 20 percent of the [U]nominal [/U]increase in GDP was attributable to [B]increased government spending.[/B] If government spending had held steady, as it had the prior two quarters, growth would have only come in at a reported [B]1.6 percent[/B].[/I][/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000CD] Read more at NetRightDaily.com: [url=http://netrightdaily.com/2012/10/government-spendings-big-impact-on-gdp/#ixzz2AiRHHDyN]NetRight Daily Government spending’s misleading impact on GDP[/url] [/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
REAL CLEAR POLITICS..... polls and tracking!
Top