Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
religion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="El Correcto" data-source="post: 6081366" data-attributes="member: 60631"><p>The Greek word for born again is anothen, which is what your New Testament was written in. It has two meanings which is Born again or born from above.</p><p>Jesus wouldn’t have spoken Greek though, he would have spoken Aramaic. The Aramaic word does not have two meanings it is only born from above or heaven.</p><p></p><p>The whole conversation Jesus had with another Aramaic speaker based around the double meaning of anothen is another reason why the Bible is very inaccurate in it’s portrayal of what Jesus would have been saying.</p><p></p><p>There was no double meaning the Aramaic language. The conversation wouldn’t have been about clearing up confusion of the double meaning of a language neither participant of the conversation spoke and clarifying that people don’t have to literally be born again.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="El Correcto, post: 6081366, member: 60631"] The Greek word for born again is anothen, which is what your New Testament was written in. It has two meanings which is Born again or born from above. Jesus wouldn’t have spoken Greek though, he would have spoken Aramaic. The Aramaic word does not have two meanings it is only born from above or heaven. The whole conversation Jesus had with another Aramaic speaker based around the double meaning of anothen is another reason why the Bible is very inaccurate in it’s portrayal of what Jesus would have been saying. There was no double meaning the Aramaic language. The conversation wouldn’t have been about clearing up confusion of the double meaning of a language neither participant of the conversation spoke and clarifying that people don’t have to literally be born again. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
religion
Top
