Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="floridays" data-source="post: 4583720" data-attributes="member: 68849">They were inducements to contract. If you are intelligent enough, you know I am not speaking of a legally binding contract.I feel the need for the disclaimer because you have shown you cannot/will not respond to the intent or direct point being made.To be clear:Inducements were made to attract qualified, stable applicants for employment, the defined pension was one of the inducements.In 2005 a choice was given to the &quot;induced&quot; to remain in a plan that may have been the tipping point on which a person may have decided to accept employment.Are you following me?In 2007, everyone that chose to stay in the plan that may have &quot;induced&quot; them to employ had it stripped away.Are you still following me?Anyone employed after 2003 was not offered the opportunity to participate in the defined plan, their pension &quot;inducement,&quot; which may have been their tipping point to accept employment may have been the PPA.Integrity, (a word [USER=55587]@Fred&#039;s Myth[/USER] offered), would dictate when an inducement is made, and a further affirmation to stay within the confines of the freely offered inducement is stripped, integrity is lost, trust is broken.Which party lost integrity, which party is not trusted?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="floridays, post: 4583720, member: 68849"] They were inducements to contract. If you are intelligent enough, you know I am not speaking of a legally binding contract. I feel the need for the disclaimer because you have shown you cannot/will not respond to the intent or direct point being made. To be clear: Inducements were made to attract qualified, stable applicants for employment, the defined pension was one of the inducements. In 2005 a choice was given to the "induced" to remain in a plan that may have been the tipping point on which a person may have decided to accept employment. Are you following me? In 2007, everyone that chose to stay in the plan that may have "induced" them to employ had it stripped away. Are you still following me? Anyone employed after 2003 was not offered the opportunity to participate in the defined plan, their pension "inducement," which may have been their tipping point to accept employment may have been the PPA. Integrity, (a word [USER=55587]@Fred's Myth[/USER] offered), would dictate when an inducement is made, and a further affirmation to stay within the confines of the freely offered inducement is stripped, integrity is lost, trust is broken. Which party lost integrity, which party is not trusted? [/QUOTE]

Verification