Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Inthegame" data-source="post: 2554151" data-attributes="member: 37112">Nice catch, you must have thought I had East Coast ghost writing for me.Already exists in NM Art 34. It&#039;s called a service pension and that 55 yr old 30 year driver retiring tomorrow got a $400 increase per month from that scoundrel negotiator Ken H in this last concession laced NM contract.I&#039;m not saying it, UPS is; or they were when in our last local negotiations we proposed all future FT jobs get filled from PT&#039;s. UPS was adamant claiming off the street hires lowers their training costs.You should have and you do have those rights. Those with classification seniority have their rights and that&#039;s fine also. My issue isn&#039;t with either system. My issue is changing any system mid stream screws someone. I don&#039;t like breaking promises. And you don&#039;t either.Figure it out Solomon, I&#039;m going ice fishing.Happy New Year...</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Inthegame, post: 2554151, member: 37112"] Nice catch, you must have thought I had East Coast ghost writing for me. Already exists in NM Art 34. It's called a service pension and that 55 yr old 30 year driver retiring tomorrow got a $400 increase per month from that scoundrel negotiator Ken H in this last concession laced NM contract. I'm not saying it, UPS is; or they were when in our last local negotiations we proposed all future FT jobs get filled from PT's. UPS was adamant claiming off the street hires lowers their training costs. You should have and you do have those rights. Those with classification seniority have their rights and that's fine also. My issue isn't with either system. My issue is changing any system mid stream screws someone. I don't like breaking promises. And you don't either. Figure it out Solomon, I'm going ice fishing. Happy New Year... [I][/I] [/QUOTE]

Verification