Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Feederquacker" data-source="post: 2636932" data-attributes="member: 52639"><p>He has a point. See, ECN wants to change a certain part of the seniority structure and say it&#039;s what the members want and at the same time he is excluding a whole segment of Members. He has consistently stated that a reason for this change was to, more or less, get over on the Street Hires that went straight to Feeder. Said repeatedly that it wasn&#039;t fair for a guy with five years to have a seniority advantage yet the Part timers with twenty years of service get no consideration. Part timers have ALWAYS been the most marginalized segment of members. They don&#039;t know as much about what is going on around them and the Full Timers don&#039;t historically take the time to help inform them. ECN is being a hypocrite by saying he&nbsp; is trying to give the &quot;majority&quot; what they want while telling the part timers to go get frigged with his obvious bias against them.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="Feederquacker, post: 2636932, member: 52639"] He has a point. See, ECN wants to change a certain part of the seniority structure and say it's what the members want and at the same time he is excluding a whole segment of Members. He has consistently stated that a reason for this change was to, more or less, get over on the Street Hires that went straight to Feeder. Said repeatedly that it wasn't fair for a guy with five years to have a seniority advantage yet the Part timers with twenty years of service get no consideration. Part timers have ALWAYS been the most marginalized segment of members. They don't know as much about what is going on around them and the Full Timers don't historically take the time to help inform them. ECN is being a hypocrite by saying he is trying to give the "majority" what they want while telling the part timers to go get frigged with his obvious bias against them. [/QUOTE]

Verification