Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="DriveInDriѵeOut" data-source="post: 1069082" data-attributes="member: 44954">I'm not really sure why FT's have to take less money so that we part timers can get what we deserve.   The problem is FT's keep voting to accept a contract that screws PT's over because FT's are getting what they want.  We can BOTH get what we want. Permanent part time jobs is a growing trend across many industries in this country to cut cost on pay and benefits.  The union should take a stance against this approach to boosting profits, but instead they embolden this tactic by letting the union inadequately represent part timers. I think a lot of the problem is the old man "well back in my day I walked 10 miles in the snow uphill both ways" attitude.</blockquote>