Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Storming the Capitol
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Macbrother" data-source="post: 4774813" data-attributes="member: 42759"><p>Why don't you ask the Supreme Court? They ruled in Pennsylvania's favor - with no dissents.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Signature verification was a <em>fraction</em> of the plaintiff's claims. <a href="https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/18618673/1/donald-j-trump-for-president-inc-v-boockvar/" target="_blank">Trump v Boockvar</a> was loaded with vague, speculative nonsense with (as was usual) zero evidence to back it up. The judge's ruling on signature verification specifically was well addressed.</p><p></p><p></p><p>No, I picked 4 cases, at random, from a 5 minute google search.</p><p></p><p>Now - why don't you put forward some court cases where fraud and illegality <strong>are</strong> affirmed by a judge? Because, you, as a legal scholar should know - <strong>that's</strong> where it matters. It's very easy for a loser to claim fraud. Any partisan hack with a microphone can claim fraud. The hard part, of course, is <strong>proving</strong> it in a court of law. Show me where you did?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Macbrother, post: 4774813, member: 42759"] Why don't you ask the Supreme Court? They ruled in Pennsylvania's favor - with no dissents. Signature verification was a [I]fraction[/I] of the plaintiff's claims. [URL='https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/18618673/1/donald-j-trump-for-president-inc-v-boockvar/']Trump v Boockvar[/URL] was loaded with vague, speculative nonsense with (as was usual) zero evidence to back it up. The judge's ruling on signature verification specifically was well addressed. No, I picked 4 cases, at random, from a 5 minute google search. Now - why don't you put forward some court cases where fraud and illegality [B]are[/B] affirmed by a judge? Because, you, as a legal scholar should know - [B]that's[/B] where it matters. It's very easy for a loser to claim fraud. Any partisan hack with a microphone can claim fraud. The hard part, of course, is [B]proving[/B] it in a court of law. Show me where you did? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Storming the Capitol
Top