Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Storming the Capitol
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="zubenelgenubi" data-source="post: 4896902" data-attributes="member: 63706"><p>This is a claim with very weak evidence. These editorialists say that this is absolutely a Q anon oath, and use the "where we go one we go all" quote to make that absolute claim. That's not an uncommon phrase, and is closely related to the military saying of "no man left behind". Q mythology incorporates military culture, so it's not that shocking or suspicious that a career military guy may say something on camera that is also used by the Q movement. Based on the standard used by those media outlets, Streetlight Manifesto's "We Will Fall Together" is absolutely Q Anon message. </p><p></p><p>I only briefly watched the short, out of context, clip from the MSNBC video, and haven't searched for the full video. Was that his family with him? Your claim was that he had his wife and family take "the oath", but that's not the impression I got from that clip.</p><p></p><p>As for his adding the qanon hashtag to his twitter, I don't use twitter, I don't understand twitter, I don't care about Twitter, so I don't know what that means, or how Flynn is using that. But let's just assume for a second that Flynn isn't a cult leader, and originally had nothing to do with Q or q anon. Could it be possible that he sees that the people who are into Q are generally good people who care about their country, and has decided to try to co-opt what could be a CIA or FBI psy-op, and try to influence these people away from the crazy aspects of Q anon? Who knows? </p><p></p><p>Flynn was a part of Trump's cabinet, of course he has ties to others in the cabinet. Trump originally condemned Flynn when he plead guilty. If you want to get some good info on the legal aspects of his case, check out Viva Frei on Youtube, he has a whole play list of videos where he breaks down the whole case from early on to the pardon.</p><p></p><p>I don't know everything that is happening, but from what I do know, it seems that people I don't find trustworthy see/saw Flynn as a threat. He may not be trustworthy, either. He and Trump may well be making their own power plays, and abusing the trust of regular people to make them. That's just as likely to me as anything else. But the establishment is too powerful, and anything that threatens that power, in my view, can't be all bad.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="zubenelgenubi, post: 4896902, member: 63706"] This is a claim with very weak evidence. These editorialists say that this is absolutely a Q anon oath, and use the "where we go one we go all" quote to make that absolute claim. That's not an uncommon phrase, and is closely related to the military saying of "no man left behind". Q mythology incorporates military culture, so it's not that shocking or suspicious that a career military guy may say something on camera that is also used by the Q movement. Based on the standard used by those media outlets, Streetlight Manifesto's "We Will Fall Together" is absolutely Q Anon message. I only briefly watched the short, out of context, clip from the MSNBC video, and haven't searched for the full video. Was that his family with him? Your claim was that he had his wife and family take "the oath", but that's not the impression I got from that clip. As for his adding the qanon hashtag to his twitter, I don't use twitter, I don't understand twitter, I don't care about Twitter, so I don't know what that means, or how Flynn is using that. But let's just assume for a second that Flynn isn't a cult leader, and originally had nothing to do with Q or q anon. Could it be possible that he sees that the people who are into Q are generally good people who care about their country, and has decided to try to co-opt what could be a CIA or FBI psy-op, and try to influence these people away from the crazy aspects of Q anon? Who knows? Flynn was a part of Trump's cabinet, of course he has ties to others in the cabinet. Trump originally condemned Flynn when he plead guilty. If you want to get some good info on the legal aspects of his case, check out Viva Frei on Youtube, he has a whole play list of videos where he breaks down the whole case from early on to the pardon. I don't know everything that is happening, but from what I do know, it seems that people I don't find trustworthy see/saw Flynn as a threat. He may not be trustworthy, either. He and Trump may well be making their own power plays, and abusing the trust of regular people to make them. That's just as likely to me as anything else. But the establishment is too powerful, and anything that threatens that power, in my view, can't be all bad. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Storming the Capitol
Top