Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="DriveInDriѵeOut" data-source="post: 1188306" data-attributes="member: 44954">I like your full post, but just to address that small part of it, there is this:<a href="http://blogs.marketwatch.com/health-exchange/2013/08/19/forever-21-takes-heat-for-dropping-coverage-cutting-hours-for-workers/" target="_blank">forever-21-takes-heat-for-dropping-coverage-cutting-hours-for-workers/</a><a href="http://blogs.marketwatch.com/health-exchange/2013/08/19/forever-21-takes-heat-for-dropping-coverage-cutting-hours-for-workers/" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://blogs.marketwatch.com/health-exchange/2013/08/19/forever-21-takes-heat-for-dropping-coverage-cutting-hours-for-workers/" target="_blank"></a>Not exactly a &quot;major&quot; company, but they did have sales of 3.64 billion last year.&nbsp; They mostly already only employed part-time employees anyways.&nbsp; But don&#039;t be surprised by the spin you&#039;ll hear about this from the right.Everyone needs to keep in mind the move to a part-time workforce happened a long time ago, before obama care was ever an issue. Part-time poverty is here to stay, with or without Obama.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="DriveInDriѵeOut, post: 1188306, member: 44954"] I like your full post, but just to address that small part of it, there is this: [URL="http://blogs.marketwatch.com/health-exchange/2013/08/19/forever-21-takes-heat-for-dropping-coverage-cutting-hours-for-workers/"]forever-21-takes-heat-for-dropping-coverage-cutting-hours-for-workers/ [/URL]Not exactly a "major" company, but they did have sales of 3.64 billion last year. They mostly already only employed part-time employees anyways. But don't be surprised by the spin you'll hear about this from the right. Everyone needs to keep in mind the move to a part-time workforce happened a long time ago, before obama care was ever an issue. Part-time poverty is here to stay, with or without Obama. [/QUOTE]

Verification