Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Blackstream" data-source="post: 3576686" data-attributes="member: 49052">I just don&#039;t understand who would vote yes for this. 4.15 is too low wage wise for both PTers and FTers. The pretty new job category is basically driving with less pay and no weekends, and probably more excessive OT because once you hit 60 hours they can finish your week in the hub to avoid DOT issues.I cannot see who is out there that is gonna see this contract and feel like they gotta vote yes because the contract will benefit them so much. It&#039;s not like 22.4 magically adds FT jobs that wouldn&#039;t have existed otherwise, UPS would have had to create more FT drivers one way or another to deal with the volume. Who is gonna look at this piece of <img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/group1/censored2.gif"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":censored2:" title="Censored2&nbsp; &nbsp; :censored2:" data-shortname=":censored2:" /> and think it&#039;s gold?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Blackstream, post: 3576686, member: 49052"] I just don't understand who would vote yes for this. 4.15 is too low wage wise for both PTers and FTers. The pretty new job category is basically driving with less pay and no weekends, and probably more excessive OT because once you hit 60 hours they can finish your week in the hub to avoid DOT issues. I cannot see who is out there that is gonna see this contract and feel like they gotta vote yes because the contract will benefit them so much. It's not like 22.4 magically adds FT jobs that wouldn't have existed otherwise, UPS would have had to create more FT drivers one way or another to deal with the volume. Who is gonna look at this piece of :censored: and think it's gold? [/QUOTE]

Verification