Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Pullman Brown" data-source="post: 3576832" data-attributes="member: 73012">Let&#039;s say a center has 70 full time drivers as of July 31, and they are red circled in under this forthcoming contract, setting aside the historical fact that the company are experts at hiding and moving jobs around so you don&#039;t know where they have gone ie.. 22.3, and other combo jobs, what the company/union has really done is drastically slowed down the creation of current top dollar driving jobs and put in place lesser paid driving jobs.So, under the current contract, that center that has 70 full time drivers and is a center in an area that is growing would be predicted to hire 10-15 new top rate drivers this year but now under this new language would only create 3-4 new top rate driving jobs because now the company/Union can hire new lesser paid drivers to fill in the gap! That sounds about right! That doesn&#039;t sound like a great deal!</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Pullman Brown, post: 3576832, member: 73012"] Let's say a center has 70 full time drivers as of July 31, and they are red circled in under this forthcoming contract, setting aside the historical fact that the company are experts at hiding and moving jobs around so you don't know where they have gone ie.. 22.3, and other combo jobs, what the company/union has really done is drastically slowed down the creation of current top dollar driving jobs and put in place lesser paid driving jobs. So, under the current contract, that center that has 70 full time drivers and is a center in an area that is growing would be predicted to hire 10-15 new top rate drivers this year but now under this new language would only create 3-4 new top rate driving jobs because now the company/Union can hire new lesser paid drivers to fill in the gap! That sounds about right! That doesn't sound like a great deal! [/QUOTE]

Verification