Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Tentative agreement
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Superteeth2478" data-source="post: 3577357" data-attributes="member: 73024"><p>You don't seem to understand the meaning of a "brotherhood", do you? For example, if your brother was about to be given, say, a <img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/group1/censored2.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":censored2:" title="Censored2 :censored2:" data-shortname=":censored2:" />ty deal on a car sale, and you were there to prevent him from taking the <img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/group1/censored2.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":censored2:" title="Censored2 :censored2:" data-shortname=":censored2:" />ty deal, you would step in as his brother and keep him from doing it, right? So on the flip side, part-timers keep getting crappy contracts reamed up their backsides, so as a brother to these part-timers, shouldn't you vote down contracts that don't take care of them, even if the same way it was your brother's fault he didn't get educated on how car sales work and it's your part-timer brothers' faults that they didn't vote, it's still part of being a brother to them to help them out?</p><p></p><p>No one said full-timers were "oppressing" the part-timers, but they are complicit in it by voting through contracts that don't take care of them. And this is the end result, a contract where the tables could very well be turned against the full-timers in favor of the historically overlooked part-timers.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Superteeth2478, post: 3577357, member: 73024"] You don't seem to understand the meaning of a "brotherhood", do you? For example, if your brother was about to be given, say, a :censored:ty deal on a car sale, and you were there to prevent him from taking the :censored:ty deal, you would step in as his brother and keep him from doing it, right? So on the flip side, part-timers keep getting crappy contracts reamed up their backsides, so as a brother to these part-timers, shouldn't you vote down contracts that don't take care of them, even if the same way it was your brother's fault he didn't get educated on how car sales work and it's your part-timer brothers' faults that they didn't vote, it's still part of being a brother to them to help them out? No one said full-timers were "oppressing" the part-timers, but they are complicit in it by voting through contracts that don't take care of them. And this is the end result, a contract where the tables could very well be turned against the full-timers in favor of the historically overlooked part-timers. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Tentative agreement
Top