Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="MIX_MASTER_ICE" data-source="post: 5660844" data-attributes="member: 77228"><p>I know was in favor of creating a 4 year progression for PT, much like the FT work under. The proposal I saw somewhere in one of these threads was PT start at $20, then top out at $30. You already been here long enough to be making over $30, you just get your annual raise. Then your annual raises apply after that, of course, once your progression is completed.. UPS started PT at $8-$8.50 for what, 25 years or longer? No progression, just an annual raise, which for a while was only half in August and half later on in February. Those split raises were atrocious! I&#039;ve never quite understood why the PT worker gets bent over so hard. And certainly not saying the PT wage should be equal to the FT wage, but I thought that implementing a progression to top pay of $30/hour was something that should have been done during this contract. If not now, then certainly not likely to ever happen.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="MIX_MASTER_ICE, post: 5660844, member: 77228"] I know was in favor of creating a 4 year progression for PT, much like the FT work under. The proposal I saw somewhere in one of these threads was PT start at $20, then top out at $30. You already been here long enough to be making over $30, you just get your annual raise. Then your annual raises apply after that, of course, once your progression is completed.. UPS started PT at $8-$8.50 for what, 25 years or longer? No progression, just an annual raise, which for a while was only half in August and half later on in February. Those split raises were atrocious! I've never quite understood why the PT worker gets bent over so hard. And certainly not saying the PT wage should be equal to the FT wage, but I thought that implementing a progression to top pay of $30/hour was something that should have been done during this contract. If not now, then certainly not likely to ever happen. [/QUOTE]

Verification