Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="vantexan" data-source="post: 5839751" data-attributes="member: 24302">They have plenty of proof.&nbsp; Y&#039;all went after Trump claiming he illegally threatened to withhold aid to Ukraine unless they investigate his chief political rival&#039;s actions.&nbsp; Biden is actually on video telling how he threatened to withhold a billion in aid if a prosecutor wasn&#039;t fired that same day.&nbsp; The prosecutor who was investigating Burisma for corruption.Hunter in an ABC interview admitted he wouldn&#039;t be paid big money to be on Burisma&#039;s board if his last name wasn&#039;t Biden.They have a couple hundred Suspicious Activity Reports from a bunch of banks showing over $20 million having been wired to the accounts of 9 Biden family members from about 20 bogus shell companies that have been found to have had millions sent from overseas sources for no work done.There&#039;s plenty more.&nbsp; But there&#039;s nothing they can do until Congress is completely controlled by the Republicans.&nbsp; A Republican AG can go after the Biden&#039;s after Joe leaves office next year.&nbsp; I&#039;m not certain but I don&#039;t think he can pardon himself until he&#039;s actually convicted of something.&nbsp; And as the special counsel just noted it&#039;s not likely they&#039;re going to prosecute a senile old man.&nbsp; But they can go after his family.&nbsp; Make it clear to people like Hillary that there&#039;s no getting away with graft on this scale anymore.Of course you&#039;ll scoff.&nbsp; But did you ever consider why the government prosecutors worked out a deal where Hunter would not be prosecuted for the weapons charge but also would be immune from any future prosecutions?&nbsp; They slipped that in and if not for a judge who took the time to read the plea deal Hunter would have gotten off scot free.&nbsp; Ever ask why they tried to pull that?&nbsp; Of course not, your side never does anything wrong.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="vantexan, post: 5839751, member: 24302"] They have plenty of proof. Y'all went after Trump claiming he illegally threatened to withhold aid to Ukraine unless they investigate his chief political rival's actions. Biden is actually on video telling how he threatened to withhold a billion in aid if a prosecutor wasn't fired that same day. The prosecutor who was investigating Burisma for corruption. Hunter in an ABC interview admitted he wouldn't be paid big money to be on Burisma's board if his last name wasn't Biden. They have a couple hundred Suspicious Activity Reports from a bunch of banks showing over $20 million having been wired to the accounts of 9 Biden family members from about 20 bogus shell companies that have been found to have had millions sent from overseas sources for no work done. There's plenty more. But there's nothing they can do until Congress is completely controlled by the Republicans. A Republican AG can go after the Biden's after Joe leaves office next year. I'm not certain but I don't think he can pardon himself until he's actually convicted of something. And as the special counsel just noted it's not likely they're going to prosecute a senile old man. But they can go after his family. Make it clear to people like Hillary that there's no getting away with graft on this scale anymore. Of course you'll scoff. But did you ever consider why the government prosecutors worked out a deal where Hunter would not be prosecuted for the weapons charge but also would be immune from any future prosecutions? They slipped that in and if not for a judge who took the time to read the plea deal Hunter would have gotten off scot free. Ever ask why they tried to pull that? Of course not, your side never does anything wrong. [/QUOTE]

Verification