Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="vantexan" data-source="post: 5807416" data-attributes="member: 24302"><p>Even if that guy eventually kills 20 people at Wal-Mart we must not infringe on his right to make threats online to do same or touch his guns?&nbsp; I&#039;m saying anyone going off like that should be taken into custody for evaluation and any weapons found at his residence should be removed until such time he&#039;s determined to not be a threat.&nbsp; And if it turns out he has illegally obtained weapons or has 20 guns and 3000 rounds of ammo with all kinds of written diatribes against society or minorities or whatever then all of that should be taken into account in his evaluation.&nbsp; His constitutional rights to spew hatred doesn&#039;t supersede the constitutional rights of others around him for safety.&nbsp; But y&#039;all don&#039;t care if it means in the even most remote way that your right to own guns is threatened.&nbsp; People getting slaughtered is just the price we pay to have a free society or some such.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="vantexan, post: 5807416, member: 24302"] Even if that guy eventually kills 20 people at Wal-Mart we must not infringe on his right to make threats online to do same or touch his guns? I'm saying anyone going off like that should be taken into custody for evaluation and any weapons found at his residence should be removed until such time he's determined to not be a threat. And if it turns out he has illegally obtained weapons or has 20 guns and 3000 rounds of ammo with all kinds of written diatribes against society or minorities or whatever then all of that should be taken into account in his evaluation. His constitutional rights to spew hatred doesn't supersede the constitutional rights of others around him for safety. But y'all don't care if it means in the even most remote way that your right to own guns is threatened. People getting slaughtered is just the price we pay to have a free society or some such. [/QUOTE]

Verification