Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="The Other Side" data-source="post: 950217" data-attributes="member: 17969">This is exactly the king of mis characterization that is taking place with the issue birth control.&nbsp; Lets say a woman who has 5 kids wants her tubes tied just in case there is an opportunity to have sex and she doesnt want to get pregnant.&nbsp; She may never have sex again in her life, but she took preparations to protect herself in the event she did.&nbsp; This has no suggestion that she is going to have frequent sex or recreational sex at a rate higher than normal.That explanation is a stretch of the truth and a great point to make to women ( of sexual activity age) who even consider of voting for the right wing candidates.The birth control pill is also used for many other uses for womens health.&nbsp; Simply saying &quot;$3000 OMG thats alot of sex&quot;&nbsp; is a ridiculous statement and more a ridiculous assumption.&nbsp; This is the kind of talk that got RUSH into trouble.Taking a mole hill and turning it into a mountain.&nbsp; FACT: If a woman is on birth control pills, that does not mean she HAS TO or is GOING TO have sex.&nbsp; The pills need to be taken daily regardless of the amount of sex or frequency.Its not like Limbaughs VIAGRA that he needs to take each time he has sex with a prostitute, thats completely different.I dont know how you can equate a daily prescribed pill and the associated cost with a &quot;frequency&quot; of having sex.&nbsp; Thats just plain silly talk.peaceTOS</blockquote>

[QUOTE="The Other Side, post: 950217, member: 17969"] This is exactly the king of mis characterization that is taking place with the issue birth control. Lets say a woman who has 5 kids wants her tubes tied just in case there is an opportunity to have sex and she doesnt want to get pregnant. She may never have sex again in her life, but she took preparations to protect herself in the event she did. This has no suggestion that she is going to have frequent sex or recreational sex at a rate higher than normal. That explanation is a stretch of the truth and a great point to make to women ( of sexual activity age) who even consider of voting for the right wing candidates. The birth control pill is also used for many other uses for womens health. Simply saying "$3000 OMG thats alot of sex" is a ridiculous statement and more a ridiculous assumption. This is the kind of talk that got RUSH into trouble. Taking a mole hill and turning it into a mountain. FACT: If a woman is on birth control pills, that does not mean she HAS TO or is GOING TO have sex. The pills need to be taken daily regardless of the amount of sex or frequency. Its not like Limbaughs VIAGRA that he needs to take each time he has sex with a prostitute, thats completely different. I dont know how you can equate a daily prescribed pill and the associated cost with a "frequency" of having sex. Thats just plain silly talk. peace TOS [/QUOTE]

Verification