Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="bacha29" data-source="post: 5611535" data-attributes="member: 58386">1. What are the names of the &quot;shell companies&quot;?2. If the banks flagged the payments were the transactions still completed? 3. Was the information provided by the informant corroborated and thus deemed accurate? I&#039;m not saying that your report lacks credibility, what I &#039;m questioning is whether or not DOJ believes that it&#039;s sufficient to gain a&nbsp; conviction and thus file a indictment. In the world of today you would be very hard pressed to find a person of wealth and political power who doesn&#039;t have at least a few dirty deeds done dirt cheap tied to their past. It&#039;s always a question of whether or not it rises to the level of a federal indictment and what the odds are of gaining a conviction. It&#039;s quite obvious that you seek some form of retaliation against Biden in an effort to make you feel better. Then again the Trump DOJ had plenty of time and opportunity to indict the Biden&#039;s but chose not to. Why not? As former DOJ official John Bolton noted what makes the Trump indictment so damning is because of it&#039;s high concentration on the facts and evidence referring to it as &quot;a bullet&quot; rather than &quot;just something thrown against the wall and hope it will stick&quot;.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="bacha29, post: 5611535, member: 58386"] 1. What are the names of the "shell companies"? 2. If the banks flagged the payments were the transactions still completed? 3. Was the information provided by the informant corroborated and thus deemed accurate? I'm not saying that your report lacks credibility, what I 'm questioning is whether or not DOJ believes that it's sufficient to gain a conviction and thus file a indictment. In the world of today you would be very hard pressed to find a person of wealth and political power who doesn't have at least a few dirty deeds done dirt cheap tied to their past. It's always a question of whether or not it rises to the level of a federal indictment and what the odds are of gaining a conviction. It's quite obvious that you seek some form of retaliation against Biden in an effort to make you feel better. Then again the Trump DOJ had plenty of time and opportunity to indict the Biden's but chose not to. Why not? As former DOJ official John Bolton noted what makes the Trump indictment so damning is because of it's high concentration on the facts and evidence referring to it as "a bullet" rather than "just something thrown against the wall and hope it will stick". [/QUOTE]

Verification