Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
THE TRUMP 2024 THREAD
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="El Correcto" data-source="post: 6025328" data-attributes="member: 60631"><p>“The tribunal also heard from a waxing expert who testified that waxing female versus male genitalia required different training, and that an untrained person attempting to wax someone's scrotum could seriously injure the client.</p><p></p><p>The legal advocacy organization Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms represented five of the aesthetician respondents.”</p><p></p><p>The ruling also found that Yaniv engaged in improper conduct by misleading the tribunal, by being untruthful, and by engaging in extortionate behaviour and scurrilous attacks.</p><p></p><p>“It was also noted that she brought most of her 15 complaints against women described as "not white," while expressing racial animosity on social media and in her testimony.</p><p></p><p>Yaniv was ordered to pay $2,000 to each of three respondents.”</p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.cbc.ca/amp/1.5330807[/URL]</p><p>Denying services based on what services you provide is not a form of discrimination. If a black person walked into a salon that doesn’t do the type of cut they are asking for, they can’t turn around a sue for denying the service.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="El Correcto, post: 6025328, member: 60631"] “The tribunal also heard from a waxing expert who testified that waxing female versus male genitalia required different training, and that an untrained person attempting to wax someone's scrotum could seriously injure the client. The legal advocacy organization Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms represented five of the aesthetician respondents.” The ruling also found that Yaniv engaged in improper conduct by misleading the tribunal, by being untruthful, and by engaging in extortionate behaviour and scurrilous attacks. “It was also noted that she brought most of her 15 complaints against women described as "not white," while expressing racial animosity on social media and in her testimony. Yaniv was ordered to pay $2,000 to each of three respondents.” [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.cbc.ca/amp/1.5330807[/URL] Denying services based on what services you provide is not a form of discrimination. If a black person walked into a salon that doesn’t do the type of cut they are asking for, they can’t turn around a sue for denying the service. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
THE TRUMP 2024 THREAD
Top