Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="El Correcto" data-source="post: 6025332" data-attributes="member: 60631">If the business doesn’t accommodate anyone with a penis that is one thing.But this guy is sitting here acting like they denied service over trans identity.it was purely genitalia. It doesn’t matter gender in this case at all and the ruling didn’t come down to “I’m denying this person service based on them being trans”.It literally has nothing to do with the topic we were discussing which was civil rights. He just derailed the convo for literally no reason other than “trans people bad”.I didn’t know anything about the case, I was just going along with hypotheticals of how it should apply if somebody is standing their ground over denying service based on identity. Your business doesn’t have religious beliefs if it is a public accommodation, your business has no right to discriminate based on those characteristics.</blockquote>